mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characteristics and prevalence of fake social media profiles with AI-generated faces

arXiv 2401.02627 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.SIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have raised concerns about their potential to create convincing fake social media accounts, but empirical evidence is lacking. In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of Twitter (X) accounts using human faces generated by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) for their profile pictures. We present a dataset of 1,420 such accounts and show that they are used to spread scams, spam, and amplify coordinated messages, among other inauthentic activities. Leveraging a feature of GAN-generated faces -- consistent eye placement -- and supplementing it with human annotation, we devise an effective method for identifying GAN-generated profiles in the wild. Applying this method to a random sample of active Twitter users, we estimate a lower bound for the prevalence of profiles using GAN-generated faces between 0.021% and 0.044% -- around 10K daily active accounts. These findings underscore the emerging threats posed by multimodal generative AI. We release the source code of our detection method and the data we collect to facilitate further investigation. Additionally, we provide practical heuristics to assist social media users in recognizing such accounts.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2024.

Builds on

30 of 57 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
  3. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  4. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  5. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
  6. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  8. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  9. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  10. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
  11. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 246
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPTcited by 224
18 more
  1. 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 158
  2. 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
  3. 2022Towards the Detection of Diffusion Model Deepfakescited by 111
  4. 2022Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedcited by 105
  5. 2014The Rise of Social Botscited by 96
  6. 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
  7. 2020Exposing GAN-generated Faces Using Inconsistent Corneal Specular Highlightscited by 59
  8. 2020Uncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media: Methods and Case Studiescited by 49
  9. 2021Eyes Tell All: Irregular Pupil Shapes Reveal GAN-generated Facescited by 48
  10. 2023Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnetcited by 36
  11. 2020Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifierscited by 32
  12. 2019Exposing GAN-synthesized Faces Using Landmark Locationscited by 30
  13. 2022GAN-generated Faces Detection: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 30
  14. 2019Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social botscited by 24
  15. 2021More Real than Real: A Study on Human Visual Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 23
  16. 2022Testing Human Ability To Detect Deepfake Images of Human Facescited by 15
  17. 2023Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Datacited by 14
  18. 2022The Value of AI Guidance in Human Examination of Synthetically-Generated Facescited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: