Testing Human Ability To Detect Deepfake Images of Human Faces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deepfakes are computationally-created entities that falsely represent reality. They can take image, video, and audio modalities, and pose a threat to many areas of systems and societies, comprising a topic of interest to various aspects of cybersecurity and cybersafety. In 2020 a workshop consulting AI experts from academia, policing, government, the private sector, and state security agencies ranked deepfakes as the most serious AI threat. These experts noted that since fake material can propagate through many uncontrolled routes, changes in citizen behaviour may be the only effective defence. This study aims to assess human ability to identify image deepfakes of human faces (StyleGAN2:FFHQ) from nondeepfake images (FFHQ), and to assess the effectiveness of simple interventions intended to improve detection accuracy. Using an online survey, 280 participants were randomly allocated to one of four groups: a control group, and 3 assistance interventions. Each participant was shown a sequence of 20 images randomly selected from a pool of 50 deepfake and 50 real images of human faces. Participants were asked if each image was AI-generated or not, to report their confidence, and to describe the reasoning behind each response. Overall detection accuracy was only just above chance and none of the interventions significantly improved this. Participants' confidence in their answers was high and unrelated to accuracy. Assessing the results on a per-image basis reveals participants consistently found certain images harder to label correctly, but reported similarly high confidence regardless of the image. Thus, although participant accuracy was 62% overall, this accuracy across images ranged quite evenly between 85% and 30%, with an accuracy of below 50% for one in every five images. We interpret the findings as suggesting that there is a need for an urgent call to action to address this threat.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 140 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.
Builds on
35 of 140 references.
References · 35
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
- 2017High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANscited by 1,176
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
- 2016Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesiscited by 735
- 2017Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 707
23 more
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2019Image2StyleGAN: How to Embed Images Into the StyleGAN Latent Space?cited by 675
- 2020GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN Controlscited by 612
- 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
- 2020StyleRig: Rigging StyleGAN for 3D Control over Portrait Imagescited by 267
- 2018Deep Video Portraitscited by 265
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2019The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Datasetcited by 208
- 2015Generating Images from Captions with Attentioncited by 135
- 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 118
- 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
- 2016Learning What and Where to Drawcited by 105
- 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
- 2017Multi-style Generative Network for Real-time Transfercited by 61
- 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
- 2020DeepFake Detection: Current Challenges and Next Stepscited by 44
- 2019MelNet: A Generative Model for Audio in the Frequency Domaincited by 41
- 2021DefakeHop: A Light-Weight High-Performance Deepfake Detectorcited by 31
- 2018Poisoning Behavioral Malware Clusteringcited by 14
- 2020Deepfake detection: humans vs. machinescited by 14
- 2021A Study of the Human Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 14
- 2017SREFI: Synthesis of Realistic Example Face Imagescited by 12
- 2016Ad-Blocking and Counter Blocking: A Slice of the Arms Racecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?cited by 21
- 2025Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarkscited by 20
- 2024Characteristics and prevalence of fake social media profiles with AI-generated facescited by 14
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clonescited by 12
- 2024Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countriescited by 8
- 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakescited by 7
- 2024The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarkingcited by 4
- 2026Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Human-AI Ensembles Improve Deepfake Detection in Low-to-Medium Quality Videoscited by 1
- 2024Linguistic traces of stochastic empathy in language modelscited by 0
- 2024Exploiting Watermark-Based Defense Mechanisms in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Unauthorized Data Usagecited by 0
- 2026The CIFAR Synthetic Evidence Corpus for Detecting AI-Generated Evidencecited by 0
3 more
- 2026Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Imagescited by 0
- 2026Frontier vision-language models have overtaken young adults at detecting AI-generated portraits -- but not their calibrationcited by 0
- 2026A Benchmark & Dataset for Detecting AI-Manipulated Visual Evidence in the Court Systemcited by 0
- 2026A Benchmark & Dataset for Detecting AI-Manipulated Visual Evidence in the Court System29 Sep 2026
- 2026Frontier vision-language models have overtaken young adults at detecting AI-generated portraits -- but not their calibration31 Aug 2026
- 2026Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images26 Jun 2026
- 2026The CIFAR Synthetic Evidence Corpus for Detecting AI-Generated Evidence6 Jun 2026
- 2026Human-AI Ensembles Improve Deepfake Detection in Low-to-Medium Quality Videos15 Mar 2026
- 2026Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos Detection1 Feb 2026
- 2025Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarks8 Aug 2025
- 2024Exploiting Watermark-Based Defense Mechanisms in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Unauthorized Data Usage22 Nov 2024
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones3 Oct 2024
- 2024Linguistic traces of stochastic empathy in language models2 Oct 2024
- 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes7 May 2024
- 2024The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking22 Apr 2024
3 more
- 2024Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?cited by 21
- 2025Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarkscited by 20
- 2024Characteristics and prevalence of fake social media profiles with AI-generated facescited by 14
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clonescited by 12
- 2024Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countriescited by 8
- 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakescited by 7
- 2024The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarkingcited by 4
- 2026Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Human-AI Ensembles Improve Deepfake Detection in Low-to-Medium Quality Videoscited by 1
- 2024Linguistic traces of stochastic empathy in language modelscited by 0
- 2026The CIFAR Synthetic Evidence Corpus for Detecting AI-Generated Evidencecited by 0
- 2026Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Imagescited by 0
12 most cited of 13 All 13 (JSON)
- 2026A Benchmark & Dataset for Detecting AI-Manipulated Visual Evidence in the Court System29 Sep 2026
- 2026Generative AI Literacy Training Improves Intelligence Analysts' Discrimination of Real and AI-Generated Images26 Jun 2026
- 2026The CIFAR Synthetic Evidence Corpus for Detecting AI-Generated Evidence6 Jun 2026
- 2026Human-AI Ensembles Improve Deepfake Detection in Low-to-Medium Quality Videos15 Mar 2026
- 2026Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos Detection1 Feb 2026
- 2025Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarks8 Aug 2025
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones3 Oct 2024
- 2024Linguistic traces of stochastic empathy in language models2 Oct 2024
- 2024Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes7 May 2024
- 2024The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking22 Apr 2024
- 2024Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?5 Feb 2024
- 2024Non-Consensual Synthetic Intimate Imagery: Prevalence, Attitudes, and Knowledge in 10 Countries26 Jan 2024
12 newest of 13 All 13 (JSON)