mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Testing Human Ability To Detect Deepfake Images of Human Faces

arXiv 2212.05056 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2022cs.HC cs.CR cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deepfakes are computationally-created entities that falsely represent reality. They can take image, video, and audio modalities, and pose a threat to many areas of systems and societies, comprising a topic of interest to various aspects of cybersecurity and cybersafety. In 2020 a workshop consulting AI experts from academia, policing, government, the private sector, and state security agencies ranked deepfakes as the most serious AI threat. These experts noted that since fake material can propagate through many uncontrolled routes, changes in citizen behaviour may be the only effective defence. This study aims to assess human ability to identify image deepfakes of human faces (StyleGAN2:FFHQ) from nondeepfake images (FFHQ), and to assess the effectiveness of simple interventions intended to improve detection accuracy. Using an online survey, 280 participants were randomly allocated to one of four groups: a control group, and 3 assistance interventions. Each participant was shown a sequence of 20 images randomly selected from a pool of 50 deepfake and 50 real images of human faces. Participants were asked if each image was AI-generated or not, to report their confidence, and to describe the reasoning behind each response. Overall detection accuracy was only just above chance and none of the interventions significantly improved this. Participants' confidence in their answers was high and unrelated to accuracy. Assessing the results on a per-image basis reveals participants consistently found certain images harder to label correctly, but reported similarly high confidence regardless of the image. Thus, although participant accuracy was 62% overall, this accuracy across images ranged quite evenly between 85% and 30%, with an accuracy of below 50% for one in every five images. We interpret the findings as suggesting that there is a need for an urgent call to action to address this threat.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 140 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.

Builds on

35 of 140 references.

References · 35

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  2. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  3. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,510
  4. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  5. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  6. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  7. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,678
  8. 2017High-Resolution Image Synthesis and Semantic Manipulation with Conditional GANscited by 1,176
  9. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,095
  10. 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 997
  11. 2016Generative Adversarial Text to Image Synthesiscited by 735
  12. 2017Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 707
23 more
  1. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  2. 2019Image2StyleGAN: How to Embed Images Into the StyleGAN Latent Space?cited by 675
  3. 2020GANSpace: Discovering Interpretable GAN Controlscited by 612
  4. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 411
  5. 2020StyleRig: Rigging StyleGAN for 3D Control over Portrait Imagescited by 267
  6. 2018Deep Video Portraitscited by 265
  7. 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
  8. 2019The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Datasetcited by 208
  9. 2015Generating Images from Captions with Attentioncited by 135
  10. 2018FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Facescited by 118
  11. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  12. 2016Learning What and Where to Drawcited by 105
  13. 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
  14. 2017Multi-style Generative Network for Real-time Transfercited by 61
  15. 2021Deepfake Detection by Human Crowds, Machines, and Machine-informed Crowdscited by 58
  16. 2020DeepFake Detection: Current Challenges and Next Stepscited by 44
  17. 2019MelNet: A Generative Model for Audio in the Frequency Domaincited by 41
  18. 2021DefakeHop: A Light-Weight High-Performance Deepfake Detectorcited by 31
  19. 2018Poisoning Behavioral Malware Clusteringcited by 14
  20. 2020Deepfake detection: humans vs. machinescited by 14
  21. 2021A Study of the Human Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 14
  22. 2017SREFI: Synthesis of Realistic Example Face Imagescited by 12
  23. 2016Ad-Blocking and Counter Blocking: A Slice of the Arms Racecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: