mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images

arXiv 2404.14244 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) have blurred the lines between authentic and machine-generated content, making it almost impossible for humans to distinguish between such media. One notable consequence is the use of AI-generated images for fake profiles on social media. While several types of disinformation campaigns and similar incidents have been reported in the past, a systematic analysis has been lacking. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale investigation of the prevalence of AI-generated profile pictures on Twitter. We tackle the challenges of a real-world measurement study by carefully integrating various data sources and designing a multi-stage detection pipeline. Our analysis of nearly 15 million Twitter profile pictures shows that 0.052% were artificially generated, confirming their notable presence on the platform. We comprehensively examine the characteristics of these accounts and their tweet content, and uncover patterns of coordinated inauthentic behavior. The results also reveal several motives, including spamming and political amplification campaigns. Our research reaffirms the need for effective detection and mitigation strategies to cope with the potential negative effects of generative AI in the future.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 60 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2024.

Builds on

60 of 123 references.

References · 60

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  6. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  7. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  8. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  9. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  10. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  11. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  12. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
38 more
  1. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
  2. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,181
  3. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 859
  4. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
  5. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 814
  6. 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
  7. 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
  8. 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 282
  9. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 278
  10. 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 272
  11. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 246
  12. 2021Projected GANs Converge Fastercited by 204
  13. 2018Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?cited by 188
  14. 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 157
  15. 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
  16. 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 123
  17. 2020TweepFake: about Detecting Deepfake Tweetscited by 117
  18. 2019BlazeFace: Sub-millisecond Neural Face Detection on Mobile GPUscited by 74
  19. 2017The spread of low-credibility content by social botscited by 73
  20. 2021A Closer Look at Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies for CNN-generated Images Detectioncited by 68
  21. 2021On the Frequency Bias of Generative Modelscited by 60
  22. 2019Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data Selectioncited by 59
  23. 2020Exposing GAN-generated Faces Using Inconsistent Corneal Specular Highlightscited by 59
  24. 2020A Decade of Social Bot Detectioncited by 48
  25. 2021Eyes Tell All: Irregular Pupil Shapes Reveal GAN-generated Facescited by 48
  26. 2018On the Origins of Memes by Means of Fringe Web Communitiescited by 45
  27. 2020SSD-GAN: Measuring the Realness in the Spatial and Spectral Domainscited by 38
  28. 2023Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnetcited by 35
  29. 2020Detecting CNN-Generated Facial Images in Real-World Scenarioscited by 32
  30. 2018Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaigncited by 30
  31. 2021Towards Universal GAN Image Detectioncited by 26
  32. 2021More Real than Real: A Study on Human Visual Perception of Synthetic Facescited by 23
  33. 2023A Representative Study on Human Detection of Artificially Generated Media Across Countriescited by 22
  34. 2019Source Generator Attribution via Inversioncited by 21
  35. 2020Training CNNs in Presence of JPEG Compression: Multimedia Forensics vs Computer Visioncited by 17
  36. 2018Voice Impersonation using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 16
  37. 2020Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulationcited by 15
  38. 2019SpoC: Spoofing Camera Fingerprintscited by 14

50 most cited of 60 All 60 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

10 papers.