DTA: Distribution Transform-based Attack for Query-Limited Scenario
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In generating adversarial examples, the conventional black-box attack methods rely on sufficient feedback from the to-be-attacked models by repeatedly querying until the attack is successful, which usually results in thousands of trials during an attack. This may be unacceptable in real applications since Machine Learning as a Service Platform (MLaaS) usually only returns the final result (i.e., hard-label) to the client and a system equipped with certain defense mechanisms could easily detect malicious queries. By contrast, a feasible way is a hard-label attack that simulates an attacked action being permitted to conduct a limited number of queries. To implement this idea, in this paper, we bypass the dependency on the to-be-attacked model and benefit from the characteristics of the distributions of adversarial examples to reformulate the attack problem in a distribution transform manner and propose a distribution transform-based attack (DTA). DTA builds a statistical mapping from the benign example to its adversarial counterparts by tackling the conditional likelihood under the hard-label black-box settings. In this way, it is no longer necessary to query the target model frequently. A well-trained DTA model can directly and efficiently generate a batch of adversarial examples for a certain input, which can be used to attack un-seen models based on the assumed transferability. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that the well-trained DTA model is not sensitive to the semantic spaces of the training dataset, meaning that the model yields acceptable attack performance on other datasets. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed idea and the superiority of DTA over the state-of-the-art.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2023.
Builds on
52 of 71 references.
References · 52
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
38 more
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,539
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,052
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2018Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Informationcited by 499
- 2018Adversarial Attacks and Defences: A Surveycited by 259
- 2018Generating Adversarial Examples with Adversarial Networkscited by 256
- 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 249
- 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
- 2019Guided Image Generation with Conditional Invertible Neural Networkscited by 147
- 2018Prior Convictions: Black-Box Adversarial Attacks with Bandits and Priorscited by 145
- 2018AutoZOOM: Autoencoder-based Zeroth Order Optimization Method for Attacking Black-box Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2020Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks with Natural Stylescited by 126
- 2019Sign-OPT: A Query-Efficient Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 118
- 2019NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
- 2020RayS: A Ray Searching Method for Hard-label Adversarial Attackcited by 94
- 2019Black-Box Adversarial Attack with Transferable Model-based Embeddingcited by 57
- 2019C-Flow: Conditional Generative Flow Models for Images and 3D Point Cloudscited by 50
- 2017Defense against Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 48
- 2021Triangle Attack: A Query-efficient Decision-based Adversarial Attackcited by 48
- 2022Query-Efficient Black-box Adversarial Attacks Guided by a Transfer-based Priorcited by 38
- 2019Structured Output Learning with Conditional Generative Flowscited by 37
- 2020AdvFlow: Inconspicuous Black-box Adversarial Attacks using Normalizing Flowscited by 35
- 2023CGBA: Curvature-aware Geometric Black-box Attackcited by 20
- 2019Conditional Adversarial Generative Flow for Controllable Image Synthesiscited by 19
- 2019A Direct Approach to Robust Deep Learning Using Adversarial Networkscited by 18
- 2020Towards Query-Efficient Black-Box Adversary with Zeroth-Order Natural Gradient Descentcited by 18
- 2020Defense for Black-box Attacks on Anti-spoofing Models by Self-Supervised Learningcited by 12
- 2021Finding Optimal Tangent Points for Reducing Distortions of Hard-label Attackscited by 11
- 2021IPatch: A Remote Adversarial Patchcited by 7
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.