Defense for Black-box Attacks on Anti-spoofing Models by Self-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-performance anti-spoofing models for automatic speaker verification (ASV), have been widely used to protect ASV by identifying and filtering spoofing audio that is deliberately generated by text-to-speech, voice conversion, audio replay, etc. However, it has been shown that high-performance anti-spoofing models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Adversarial attacks, that are indistinguishable from original data but result in the incorrect predictions, are dangerous for anti-spoofing models and not in dispute we should detect them at any cost. To explore this issue, we proposed to employ Mockingjay, a self-supervised learning based model, to protect anti-spoofing models against adversarial attacks in the black-box scenario. Self-supervised learning models are effective in improving downstream task performance like phone classification or ASR. However, their effect in defense for adversarial attacks has not been explored yet. In this work, we explore the robustness of self-supervised learned high-level representations by using them in the defense against adversarial attacks. A layerwise noise to signal ratio (LNSR) is proposed to quantize and measure the effectiveness of deep models in countering adversarial noise. Experimental results on the ASVspoof 2019 dataset demonstrate that high-level representations extracted by Mockingjay can prevent the transferability of adversarial examples, and successfully counter black-box attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 5; 2023: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Adversarial defense for automatic speaker verification by cascaded self-supervised learning modelscited by 16
- 2021Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learningcited by 16
- 2022Partially Fake Audio Detection by Self-attention-based Fake Span Discoverycited by 14
- 2021Voting for the right answer: Adversarial defense for speaker verificationcited by 12
- 2021Adversarial Sample Detection for Speaker Verification by Neural Vocoderscited by 8
- 2021Practical Attacks on Voice Spoofing Countermeasurescited by 7
- 2021Characterizing the adversarial vulnerability of speech self-supervised learningcited by 5
- 2022Exposing Fine-Grained Adversarial Vulnerability of Face Anti-Spoofing Modelscited by 3
- 2022Push-Pull: Characterizing the Adversarial Robustness for Audio-Visual Active Speaker Detectioncited by 3
- 2022Adversarial Speaker Distillation for Countermeasure Model on Automatic Speaker Verificationcited by 2
- 2022Tackling Spoofing-Aware Speaker Verification with Multi-Model Fusioncited by 1
- 2023DTA: Distribution Transform-based Attack for Query-Limited Scenariocited by 0
- 2023DTA: Distribution Transform-based Attack for Query-Limited Scenario12 Dec 2023
- 2022Push-Pull: Characterizing the Adversarial Robustness for Audio-Visual Active Speaker Detection3 Oct 2022
- 2022Tackling Spoofing-Aware Speaker Verification with Multi-Model Fusion18 Jun 2022
- 2022Exposing Fine-Grained Adversarial Vulnerability of Face Anti-Spoofing Models30 May 2022
- 2022Adversarial Speaker Distillation for Countermeasure Model on Automatic Speaker Verification31 Mar 2022
- 2022Partially Fake Audio Detection by Self-attention-based Fake Span Discovery14 Feb 2022
- 2021Characterizing the adversarial vulnerability of speech self-supervised learning8 Nov 2021
- 2021Practical Attacks on Voice Spoofing Countermeasures30 Jul 2021
- 2021Adversarial Sample Detection for Speaker Verification by Neural Vocoders1 Jul 2021
- 2021Voting for the right answer: Adversarial defense for speaker verification15 Jun 2021
- 2021Improving the Adversarial Robustness for Speaker Verification by Self-Supervised Learning1 Jun 2021
- 2021Adversarial defense for automatic speaker verification by cascaded self-supervised learning models14 Feb 2021