mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical

arXiv 2311.15502 ↗First posted 27 Nov 2023cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complementary-label learning is a weakly supervised learning problem in which each training example is associated with one or multiple complementary labels indicating the classes to which it does not belong. Existing consistent approaches have relied on the uniform distribution assumption to model the generation of complementary labels, or on an ordinary-label training set to estimate the transition matrix in non-uniform cases. However, either condition may not be satisfied in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel consistent approach that does not rely on these conditions. Inspired by the positive-unlabeled (PU) learning literature, we propose an unbiased risk estimator based on the Selected-Completely-at-Random assumption for complementary-label learning. We then introduce a risk-correction approach to address overfitting problems. Furthermore, we find that complementary-label learning can be expressed as a set of negative-unlabeled binary classification problems when using the one-versus-rest strategy. Extensive experimental results on both synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets validate the superiority of our proposed approach over state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2023.

Builds on

41 of 71 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  6. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  7. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  8. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 290
  9. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 219
  10. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  11. 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
  12. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
29 more
  1. 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
  2. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  3. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 68
  4. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  5. 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
  6. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
  7. 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
  8. 2021Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approachcited by 52
  9. 2016Theoretical Comparisons of Positive-Unlabeled Learning against Positive-Negative Learningcited by 41
  10. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  11. 2022Dist-PU: Positive-Unlabeled Learning from a Label Distribution Perspectivecited by 38
  12. 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
  13. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  14. 2018Active Learning with Partial Feedbackcited by 27
  15. 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
  16. 2021Learning from Similarity-Confidence Datacited by 19
  17. 2020Rethinking Class-Prior Estimation for Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 15
  18. 2023Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learningcited by 14
  19. 2019An Unbiased Risk Estimator for Learning with Augmented Classescited by 13
  20. 2023Binary Classification with Confidence Differencecited by 13
  21. 2019Negative sampling in semi-supervised learningcited by 11
  22. 2022An Embarrassingly Simple Approach to Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Learningcited by 10
  23. 2023Beyond Myopia: Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data through Holistic Predictive Trendscited by 10
  24. 2022Reduction from Complementary-Label Learning to Probability Estimatescited by 7
  25. 2022Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Losscited by 7
  26. 2020Learning from a Complementary-label Source Domain: Theory and Algorithmscited by 6
  27. 2022Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Contrastive Complementary Labelingcited by 5
  28. 2022Adversarial Training with Complementary Labels: On the Benefit of Gradually Informative Attackscited by 4
  29. 2022Learning From Positive and Unlabeled Data Using Observer-GANcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.