Learning from Complementary Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While precise data observation is essential for the learning processes of predictive models, it can be challenging owing to factors such as insufficient observation accuracy, high collection costs, and privacy constraints. In this paper, we examines cases where some qualitative features are unavailable as precise information indicating "what it is," but rather as complementary information indicating "what it is not." We refer to features defined by precise information as ordinary features (OFs) and those defined by complementary information as complementary features (CFs). We then formulate a new learning scenario termed Complementary Feature Learning (CFL), where predictive models are constructed using instances consisting of OFs and CFs. The simplest formalization of CFL applies conventional supervised learning directly using the observed values of CFs. However, this approach does not resolve the ambiguity associated with CFs, making learning challenging and complicating the interpretation of the predictive model's specific predictions. Therefore, we derive an objective function from an information-theoretic perspective to estimate the OF values corresponding to CFs and to predict output labels based on these estimations. Based on this objective function, we propose a theoretically guaranteed graph-based estimation method along with its practical approximation, for estimating OF values corresponding to CFs. The results of numerical experiments conducted with real-world data demonstrate that our proposed method effectively estimates OF values corresponding to CFs and predicts output labels.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.
Builds on
21 of 61 references.
References · 21
- 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 349
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
- 2020not-MIWAE: Deep Generative Modelling with Missing not at Random Datacited by 61
- 2021What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?cited by 61
- 2021Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges and Directionscited by 58
- 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
- 2019On the consistency of supervised learning with missing valuescited by 52
- 2023Conformal Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
- 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
- 2019A Regularization Approach for Instance-Based Superset Label Learningcited by 21
9 more
- 2020Linear predictor on linearly-generated data with missing values: non consistency and solutionscited by 20
- 2019Generative-Discriminative Complementary Learningcited by 12
- 2020Bridging Ordinary-Label Learning and Complementary-Label Learningcited by 11
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practicalcited by 10
- 2022Learning with Partial Labels from Semi-supervised Perspectivecited by 9
- 2023ALIM: Adjusting Label Importance Mechanism for Noisy Partial Label Learningcited by 9
- 2022Reduction from Complementary-Label Learning to Probability Estimatescited by 7
- 2022Class-Imbalanced Complementary-Label Learning via Weighted Losscited by 7
- 2023Weakly Supervised Regression with Interval Targetscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.