Exploiting the Potential Supervision Information of Clean Samples in Partial Label Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Diminishing the impact of false-positive labels is critical for conducting disambiguation in partial label learning. However, the existing disambiguation strategies mainly focus on exploiting the characteristics of individual partial label instances while neglecting the strong supervision information of clean samples randomly lying in the datasets. In this work, we show that clean samples can be collected to offer guidance and enhance the confidence of the most possible candidates. Motivated by the manner of the differentiable count loss strat- egy and the K-Nearest-Neighbor algorithm, we proposed a new calibration strategy called CleanSE. Specifically, we attribute the most reliable candidates with higher significance under the assumption that for each clean sample, if its label is one of the candidates of its nearest neighbor in the representation space, it is more likely to be the ground truth of its neighbor. Moreover, clean samples offer help in characterizing the sample distributions by restricting the label counts of each label to a specific interval. Extensive experiments on 3 synthetic benchmarks and 5 real-world PLL datasets showed this calibration strategy can be applied to most of the state-of-the-art PLL methods as well as enhance their performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 48 references.
References · 18
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
- 2020Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learningcited by 102
- 2020Provably Consistent Partial-Label Learningcited by 92
- 2021Leveraged Weighted Loss for Partial Label Learningcited by 66
- 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
- 2023Variational Positive-incentive Noise: How Noise Benefits Modelscited by 38
- 2022SIMPLE: A Gradient Estimator for k-Subset Samplingcited by 34
- 2022SoLar: Sinkhorn Label Refinery for Imbalanced Partial-Label Learningcited by 30
- 2019GM-PLL: Graph Matching based Partial Label Learningcited by 23
- 2022Progressive Purification for Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 23
- 2022PiCO+: Contrastive Label Disambiguation for Robust Partial Label Learningcited by 21
6 more
- 2021On the Robustness of Average Losses for Partial-Label Learningcited by 20
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practicalcited by 10
- 2023ALIM: Adjusting Label Importance Mechanism for Noisy Partial Label Learningcited by 9
- 2023A Unified Approach to Count-Based Weakly-Supervised Learningcited by 9
- 2024Mixed Blessing: Class-Wise Embedding guided Instance-Dependent Partial Label Learningcited by 7
- 2018A Self-paced Regularization Framework for Partial-Label Learningcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.