mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reduction from Complementary-Label Learning to Probability Estimates

arXiv 2209.09500 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2022cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complementary-Label Learning (CLL) is a weakly-supervised learning problem that aims to learn a multi-class classifier from only complementary labels, which indicate a class to which an instance does not belong. Existing approaches mainly adopt the paradigm of reduction to ordinary classification, which applies specific transformations and surrogate losses to connect CLL back to ordinary classification. Those approaches, however, face several limitations, such as the tendency to overfit or be hooked on deep models. In this paper, we sidestep those limitations with a novel perspective--reduction to probability estimates of complementary classes. We prove that accurate probability estimates of complementary labels lead to good classifiers through a simple decoding step. The proof establishes a reduction framework from CLL to probability estimates. The framework offers explanations of several key CLL approaches as its special cases and allows us to design an improved algorithm that is more robust in noisy environments. The framework also suggests a validation procedure based on the quality of probability estimates, leading to an alternative way to validate models with only complementary labels. The flexible framework opens a wide range of unexplored opportunities in using deep and non-deep models for probability estimates to solve the CLL problem. Empirical experiments further verified the framework's efficacy and robustness in various settings.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2022.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  3. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  4. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  5. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  6. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  7. 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
  8. 2019Learning with Multiple Complementary Labelscited by 53
  9. 2018On the Minimal Supervision for Training Any Binary Classifier from Only Unlabeled Datacited by 43
  10. 2020Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labelscited by 29
  11. 2019Generative-Discriminative Complementary Learningcited by 12
  12. 2020Bridging Ordinary-Label Learning and Complementary-Label Learningcited by 11
2 more
  1. 2020Learning from a Complementary-label Source Domain: Theory and Algorithmscited by 6
  2. 2020Multi-Complementary and Unlabeled Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

7 papers.