Rethinking Precision of Pseudo Label: Test-Time Adaptation via Complementary Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we propose a novel complementary learning approach to enhance test-time adaptation (TTA), which has been proven to exhibit good performance on testing data with distribution shifts such as corruptions. In test-time adaptation tasks, information from the source domain is typically unavailable and the model has to be optimized without supervision for test-time samples. Hence, usual methods assign labels for unannotated data with the prediction by a well-trained source model in an unsupervised learning framework. Previous studies have employed unsupervised objectives, such as the entropy of model predictions, as optimization targets to effectively learn features for test-time samples. However, the performance of the model is easily compromised by the quality of pseudo-labels, since inaccuracies in pseudo-labels introduce noise to the model. Therefore, we propose to leverage the "less probable categories" to decrease the risk of incorrect pseudo-labeling. The complementary label is introduced to designate these categories. We highlight that the risk function of complementary labels agrees with their Vanilla loss formula under the conventional true label distribution. Experiments show that the proposed learning algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance on different datasets and experiment settings.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2023.
Builds on
19 of 27 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2020Suppressing Uncertainties for Large-Scale Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 157
- 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 98
- 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
- 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
7 more
- 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
- 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 67
- 2018Complementary-Label Learning for Arbitrary Losses and Modelscited by 57
- 2018Joint Domain Alignment and Discriminative Feature Learning for Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 45
- 2021If your data distribution shifts, use self-learningcited by 36
- 2019Negative sampling in semi-supervised learningcited by 11
- 2020SceneAdapt: Scene-based domain adaptation for semantic segmentation using adversarial learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practicalcited by 10
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 6
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2025Test-time Correlation Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 2
- 2024Category-wise Fine-Tuning: Resisting Incorrect Pseudo-Labels in Multi-Label Image Classification with Partial Labelscited by 1
- 2025FRET: Feature Redundancy Elimination for Test Time Adaptationcited by 1
- 2025CodeMerge: Codebook-Guided Model Merging for Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2024ESP-Zero: Unsupervised enhancement of zero-shot classification for Extremely Sparse Point cloudcited by 0
- 2026Learning Robustness at Test-Time from a Non-Robust Teachercited by 0
- 2026Temporal Memory-Aware Online Test-Time Adaptation on Dynamic Graphs28 Aug 2026
- 2026Recent advances in weakly supervised learning: New supervision paradigms, assumption relaxations, and practical solutions7 Aug 2026
- 2026Learning Robustness at Test-Time from a Non-Robust Teacher13 Apr 2026
- 2025PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptation3 Jun 2025
- 2025CodeMerge: Codebook-Guided Model Merging for Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Autonomous Driving22 May 2025
- 2025FRET: Feature Redundancy Elimination for Test Time Adaptation15 May 2025
- 2025Test-time Correlation Alignment1 May 2025
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection21 Jun 2024
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detection19 Jun 2024
- 2024ESP-Zero: Unsupervised enhancement of zero-shot classification for Extremely Sparse Point cloud30 Apr 2024
- 2024Category-wise Fine-Tuning: Resisting Incorrect Pseudo-Labels in Multi-Label Image Classification with Partial Labels30 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical27 Nov 2023
2 more
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 43
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practicalcited by 10
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 6
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2025Test-time Correlation Alignmentcited by 3
- 2025PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 2
- 2024Category-wise Fine-Tuning: Resisting Incorrect Pseudo-Labels in Multi-Label Image Classification with Partial Labelscited by 1
- 2025FRET: Feature Redundancy Elimination for Test Time Adaptationcited by 1
- 2024ESP-Zero: Unsupervised enhancement of zero-shot classification for Extremely Sparse Point cloudcited by 0
- 2026Learning Robustness at Test-Time from a Non-Robust Teachercited by 0
- 2026Recent advances in weakly supervised learning: New supervision paradigms, assumption relaxations, and practical solutionscited by 0
12 most cited of 13 All 13 (JSON)
- 2026Temporal Memory-Aware Online Test-Time Adaptation on Dynamic Graphs28 Aug 2026
- 2026Recent advances in weakly supervised learning: New supervision paradigms, assumption relaxations, and practical solutions7 Aug 2026
- 2026Learning Robustness at Test-Time from a Non-Robust Teacher13 Apr 2026
- 2025PAID: Pairwise Angular-Invariant Decomposition for Continual Test-Time Adaptation3 Jun 2025
- 2025FRET: Feature Redundancy Elimination for Test Time Adaptation15 May 2025
- 2025Test-time Correlation Alignment1 May 2025
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection21 Jun 2024
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detection19 Jun 2024
- 2024ESP-Zero: Unsupervised enhancement of zero-shot classification for Extremely Sparse Point cloud30 Apr 2024
- 2024Category-wise Fine-Tuning: Resisting Incorrect Pseudo-Labels in Multi-Label Image Classification with Partial Labels30 Jan 2024
- 2023Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical27 Nov 2023
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Survey31 Oct 2023
12 newest of 13 All 13 (JSON)