Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Organizations are increasingly recognizing the value of data collaboration for data analytics purposes. Yet, stringent data protection laws prohibit the direct exchange of raw data. To facilitate data collaboration, federated Learning (FL) emerges as a viable solution, which enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a machine learning (ML) model under the supervision of a central server while ensuring the confidentiality of their raw data. However, existing studies have unveiled two main risks: (i) the potential for the server to infer sensitive information from the client's uploaded updates (i.e., model gradients), compromising client input privacy, and (ii) the risk of malicious clients uploading malformed updates to poison the FL model, compromising input integrity. Recent works utilize secure aggregation with zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) to guarantee input privacy and integrity in FL. Nevertheless, they suffer from extremely low efficiency and, thus, are impractical for real deployment. In this paper, we propose a novel and highly efficient solution RiseFL for secure and verifiable data collaboration, ensuring input privacy and integrity simultaneously.Firstly, we devise a probabilistic integrity check method that significantly reduces the cost of ZKP generation and verification. Secondly, we design a hybrid commitment scheme to satisfy Byzantine robustness with improved performance. Thirdly, we theoretically prove the security guarantee of the proposed solution. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets suggest that our solution is effective and is highly efficient in both client computation and communication. For instance, RiseFL is up to 28x, 53x and 164x faster than three state-of-the-art baselines ACORN, RoFL and EIFFeL for the client computation.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2023.
Builds on
31 of 84 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 307
19 more
- 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
- 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 148
- 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 127
- 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
- 2020Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based Modelscited by 89
- 2021ACORN: Adaptive Coordinate Networks for Neural Scene Representationcited by 64
- 2022FederatedScope: A Flexible Federated Learning Platform for Heterogeneitycited by 53
- 2022BlindFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your Datacited by 36
- 2017Prio: Private, Robust, and Scalable Computation of Aggregate Statisticscited by 35
- 2018Defending Against Saddle Point Attack in Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learningcited by 32
- 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2021Improving Fairness for Data Valuation in Horizontal Federated Learningcited by 22
- 2023Practical Differentially Private and Byzantine-resilient Federated Learningcited by 18
- 2022Aggregation Service for Federated Learning: An Efficient, Secure, and More Resilient Realizationcited by 16
- 2019Contamination Attacks and Mitigation in Multi-Party Machine Learningcited by 13
- 2021Enabling SQL-based Training Data Debugging for Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2022Skellam Mixture Mechanism: a Novel Approach to Federated Learning with Differential Privacycited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024NeurDB: An AI-powered Autonomous Data Systemcited by 5
- 2025Generative AI for Healthcare: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Perspectivescited by 3
- 2025On the Security and Privacy of Federated Learning: A Survey with Attacks, Defenses, Frameworks, Applications, and Future Directionscited by 2
- 2026OPFL: Optimistic Verification of Federated Learning via Empirical Boundarycited by 0
- 2026OPFL: Optimistic Verification of Federated Learning via Empirical Boundary29 Sep 2026
- 2025Generative AI for Healthcare: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Perspectives28 Oct 2025
- 2025On the Security and Privacy of Federated Learning: A Survey with Attacks, Defenses, Frameworks, Applications, and Future Directions19 Aug 2025
- 2024NeurDB: An AI-powered Autonomous Data System7 May 2024