Enabling SQL-based Training Data Debugging for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How can we debug a logistical regression model in a federated learning setting when seeing the model behave unexpectedly (e.g., the model rejects all high-income customers' loan applications)? The SQL-based training data debugging framework has proved effective to fix this kind of issue in a non-federated learning setting. Given an unexpected query result over model predictions, this framework automatically removes the label errors from training data such that the unexpected behavior disappears in the retrained model. In this paper, we enable this powerful framework for federated learning. The key challenge is how to develop a security protocol for federated debugging which is proved to be secure, efficient, and accurate. Achieving this goal requires us to investigate how to seamlessly integrate the techniques from multiple fields (Databases, Machine Learning, and Cybersecurity). We first propose FedRain, which extends Rain, the state-of-the-art SQL-based training data debugging framework, to our federated learning setting. We address several technical challenges to make FedRain work and analyze its security guarantee and time complexity. The analysis results show that FedRain falls short in terms of both efficiency and security. To overcome these limitations, we redesign our security protocol and propose Frog, a novel SQL-based training data debugging framework tailored for federated learning. Our theoretical analysis shows that Frog is more secure, more accurate, and more efficient than FedRain. We conduct extensive experiments using several real-world datasets and a case study. The experimental results are consistent with our theoretical analysis and validate the effectiveness of Frog in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2021.
Builds on
23 of 65 references.
References · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2019Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applicationscited by 412
- 2017Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryptioncited by 176
- 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 176
- 2020Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based Modelscited by 89
- 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
- 2019Practical Federated Gradient Boosting Decision Treescited by 54
- 2019Parallel Distributed Logistic Regression for Vertical Federated Learning without Third-Party Coordinatorcited by 52
- 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
11 more
- 2020FOCUS: Dealing with Label Quality Disparity in Federated Learningcited by 36
- 2019Towards Federated Graph Learning for Collaborative Financial Crimes Detectioncited by 33
- 2019HoloDetect: Few-Shot Learning for Error Detectioncited by 31
- 2021A Data Quality-Driven View of MLOpscited by 31
- 2019Automated Machine Learning: State-of-The-Art and Open Challengescited by 29
- 2020FederBoost: Private Federated Learning for GBDTcited by 27
- 2017BoostClean: Automated Error Detection and Repair for Machine Learningcited by 23
- 2020Model Assertions for Monitoring and Improving ML Modelscited by 22
- 2020Complaint-driven Training Data Debugging for Query 2.0cited by 16
- 2020Quality Inference in Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 15
- 2020Privacy-preserving Decentralized Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measurescited by 16
- 2023Eliminating Label Leakage in Tree-Based Vertical Federated Learningcited by 6
- 2023Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 5
- 2023FedST: Secure Federated Shapelet Transformation for Time Series Classificationcited by 1
- 2024Data Debugging is NP-hard for Classifiers Trained with SGDcited by 1
- 2023Comparative Evaluation of Data Decoupling Techniques for Federated Machine Learning with Database as a Servicecited by 0
- 2024Enhancing Data Provenance and Model Transparency in Federated Learning Systems -- A Database Approachcited by 0
- 2026ProToken: Token-Level Attribution for Federated Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026ProToken: Token-Level Attribution for Federated Large Language Models27 Jan 2026
- 2024Data Debugging is NP-hard for Classifiers Trained with SGD2 Aug 2024
- 2024Enhancing Data Provenance and Model Transparency in Federated Learning Systems -- A Database Approach3 Mar 2024
- 2023Secure and Verifiable Data Collaboration with Low-Cost Zero-Knowledge Proofs26 Nov 2023
- 2023A Survey for Federated Learning Evaluations: Goals and Measures23 Aug 2023
- 2023Eliminating Label Leakage in Tree-Based Vertical Federated Learning19 Jul 2023
- 2023Comparative Evaluation of Data Decoupling Techniques for Federated Machine Learning with Database as a Service15 Mar 2023
- 2023FedST: Secure Federated Shapelet Transformation for Time Series Classification21 Feb 2023