PixFoundation 2.0: Do Video Multi-Modal LLMs Use Motion in Visual Grounding?
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Video understanding with MLLMs
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have shown impressive generalization across tasks using images and text modalities. While their extension to video has enabled tasks such as video question answering and video captioning, their pixel-level visual grounding abilities are less studied. In this work, we raise the pertinent question of whether motion is used in pixel-level visual grounding and whether video MLLMs can segment objects based on natural language expressions describing their motion patterns. We identify the shortcomings in the current benchmarks, where we show that a single frame can often suffice for capturing the motion referring expression without any temporal reasoning. To address this, we introduce four motion-centric probing techniques, particularly designed for the visual grounding task, to study video MLLMs' ability to identify true motion from a fake one and their ability to grasp the motion order. Consequently, we provide a motion-centric benchmark, MoCentric-Bench. It ensures that video MLLMs are evaluated towards leveraging the interaction between motion and language rather than being dominated by static appearance cues emphasized in existing visual grounding datasets. We further establish strong single-image baselines that are on par with or outperform prior methods. Finally, we explore simple motion-centric adaptation techniques that provide state-of-the-art performance on our MoCentric-Bench. Our motion-centric benchmark, evaluation and findings challenge future models to improve dense spatiotemporal grounding and pixel-level understanding within videos. Code and datasets will be made publicly available at https://github.com/MSiam/PixFoundation-2.0.git.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Video understanding with MLLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.
Builds on
36 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Seeing the Arrow of Time in Large Multimodal Models3 Jun
- 2024Apollo: An Exploration of Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Models13 Dec
- 2024VideoGLaMM: A Large Multimodal Model for Pixel-Level Visual Grounding in Videos7 Nov
- 2024MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding20 Jun
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis31 May
- 2023Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projection16 Nov
Other references · 30
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,599
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
18 more
- 2023Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Modelscited by 1,062
- 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 957
- 2023LISA: Reasoning Segmentation via Large Language Modelcited by 776
- 2023GLaMM: Pixel Grounding Large Multimodal Modelcited by 455
- 2023Chat-UniVi: Unified Visual Representation Empowers Large Language Models with Image and Video Understandingcited by 371
- 2023MeViS: A Large-scale Benchmark for Video Segmentation with Motion Expressionscited by 228
- 2022Language as Queries for Referring Video Object Segmentationcited by 182
- 2022Revisiting the "Video" in Video-Language Understandingcited by 169
- 2025Sa2VA: Marrying SAM2 with MLLM for Dense Grounded Understanding of Images and Videoscited by 159
- 2024VISA: Reasoning Video Object Segmentation via Large Language Modelscited by 127
- 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
- 2023LLaVA-Grounding: Grounded Visual Chat with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 113
- 2024From Multimodal LLMs to Generalist Embodied Agents: Methods and Lessonscited by 42
- 2023Tracking with Human-Intent Reasoningcited by 33
- 2022A Deeper Dive Into What Deep Spatiotemporal Networks Encode: Quantifying Static vs. Dynamic Informationcited by 26
- 2022Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networkscited by 7
- 2025PixFoundation: Are We Heading in the Right Direction with Pixel-level Vision Foundation Models?cited by 4
- 2023MED-VT++: Unifying Multimodal Learning with a Multiscale Encoder-Decoder Video Transformercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey on Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal Large Language Model
- 2025Towards Understanding Visual Grounding in Visual Language Models
- 2024MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs
- 2025MotionSight: Boosting Fine-Grained Motion Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
- 2024Motion-Grounded Video Reasoning: Understanding and Perceiving Motion at Pixel Level
- 2025MASS: Motion-Aware Spatial-Temporal Grounding for Physics Reasoning and Comprehension in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Toward Visual Grounding: A Survey
- 2026SPARROW: Learning Spatial Precision and Temporal Referential Consistency in Pixel-Grounded Video MLLMs