mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generation

arXiv 2502.17943 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Legal case documents play a critical role in judicial proceedings. As the number of cases continues to rise, the reliance on manual drafting of legal case documents is facing increasing pressure and challenges. The development of large language models (LLMs) offers a promising solution for automating document generation. However, existing benchmarks fail to fully capture the complexities involved in drafting legal case documents in real-world scenarios. To address this gap, we introduce CaseGen, the benchmark for multi-stage legal case documents generation in the Chinese legal domain. CaseGen is based on 500 real case samples annotated by legal experts and covers seven essential case sections. It supports four key tasks: drafting defense statements, writing trial facts, composing legal reasoning, and generating judgment results. To the best of our knowledge, CaseGen is the first benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs in the context of legal case document generation. To ensure an accurate and comprehensive evaluation, we design the LLM-as-a-judge evaluation framework and validate its effectiveness through human annotations. We evaluate several widely used general-domain LLMs and legal-specific LLMs, highlighting their limitations in case document generation and pinpointing areas for potential improvement. This work marks a step toward a more effective framework for automating legal case documents drafting, paving the way for the reliable application of AI in the legal field. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/CSHaitao/CaseGen.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2025.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  5. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  6. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  7. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  8. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 170
  9. 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
  10. 2023SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case Retrievalcited by 62
  11. 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 59
  12. 2023LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Datasetcited by 38
6 more
  1. 2024CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 34
  2. 2024BLADE: Enhancing Black-box Large Language Models with Small Domain-Specific Modelscited by 15
  3. 2023LAiW: A Chinese Legal Large Language Models Benchmarkcited by 9
  4. 2024DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignmentcited by 9
  5. 2023An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrievalcited by 6
  6. 2024Towards an In-Depth Comprehension of Case Relevance for Better Legal Retrievalcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.