GuRE:Generative Query REwriter for Legal Passage Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Legal Passage Retrieval (LPR) systems are crucial as they help practitioners save time when drafting legal arguments. However, it remains an underexplored avenue. One primary reason is the significant vocabulary mismatch between the query and the target passage. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective method, the Generative query REwriter (GuRE). We leverage the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by training the LLM for query rewriting. "Rewritten queries" help retrievers to retrieve target passages by mitigating vocabulary mismatch. Experimental results show that GuRE significantly improves performance in a retriever-agnostic manner, outperforming all baseline methods. Further analysis reveals that different training objectives lead to distinct retrieval behaviors, making GuRE more suitable than direct retriever fine-tuning for real-world applications. Codes are avaiable at github.com/daehuikim/GuRE.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 42 references.
References · 18
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 554
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2019Document Expansion by Query Predictioncited by 231
- 2017Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Replycited by 229
- 2024SaulLM-7B: A pioneering Large Language Model for Lawcited by 142
- 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
6 more
- 2024BM25S: Orders of magnitude faster lexical search via eager sparse scoringcited by 88
- 2023LeCaRDv2: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Case Retrieval Datasetcited by 38
- 2024CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generationcited by 18
- 2024Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulationcited by 15
- 2021What About the Precedent: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Common Lawcited by 11
- 2024Enhancing Legal Case Retrieval via Scaling High-quality Synthetic Query-Candidate Pairscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.
6 papers.
- 2026DALDALL: Data Augmentation for Lexical and Semantic Diverse in Legal Domain by leveraging LLM-Personacited by 1
- 2026GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrievalcited by 1
- 2025When & How to Write for Personalized Demand-aware Query Rewriting in Video Searchcited by 0
- 2026Masking or Mitigating? Deconstructing the Impact of Query Rewriting on Retriever Biases in RAGcited by 0
- 2026Decompose-and-Refine: Structured Legal Question Answering with Parametric Retrievalcited by 0
- 2026UK-PRBENCH: A Paragraph-Level Precedent Retrieval Benchmark for United Kingdom Case Lawcited by 0
- 2026UK-PRBENCH: A Paragraph-Level Precedent Retrieval Benchmark for United Kingdom Case Law21 Sep 2026
- 2026GreekBarRetrieval: A Benchmark for Greek Statutory Retrieval19 Aug 2026
- 2026Decompose-and-Refine: Structured Legal Question Answering with Parametric Retrieval23 May 2026
- 2026Masking or Mitigating? Deconstructing the Impact of Query Rewriting on Retriever Biases in RAG7 Apr 2026
- 2026DALDALL: Data Augmentation for Lexical and Semantic Diverse in Legal Domain by leveraging LLM-Persona24 Mar 2026
- 2025When & How to Write for Personalized Demand-aware Query Rewriting in Video Search17 Dec 2025