mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SocREval: Large Language Models with the Socratic Method for Reference-Free Reasoning Evaluation

arXiv 2310.00074 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 27

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

To comprehensively gauge the capacity of current models for complex reasoning, it is crucial to assess their step-by-step reasoning in a scalable manner. Established reference-based evaluation metrics rely on human-annotated reasoning chains as references to assess the model-derived chains. However, such "gold-standard" human-written reasoning chains may not be unique and their acquisition is often labor-intensive. Existing reference-free reasoning evaluation metrics, while eliminating the need for human-crafted reasoning chains as references, often require fine-tuning with human-derived chains before evaluation, complicating the process and questioning their adaptability to other datasets. To address these challenges, we harness GPT-4 to automatically evaluate reasoning chain quality, thereby removing the dependency on human-written reasoning chains for both model fine-tuning and evaluative purposes. Leveraging the Socratic method, we develop SocREval (bf Socratic Method-Inspired bf Reasoning bf Evaluation), a novel approach for prompt design in reference-free reasoning evaluation. Empirical results from four human annotated datasets reveal that SocREval significantly improves GPT-4's performance, surpassing existing reference-free and reference-based reasoning evaluation metrics. Beyond its demonstrated efficacy, SocREval, proves to be both cost-efficient and robust to prompt writing and example selection, as substantiated by our in-depth analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 41 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2023.

Builds on

41 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023GPT-4 Can't Reason21 Jul
  2. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Report17 May
  3. 2023ReCEval: Evaluating Reasoning Chains via Correctness and Informativeness21 Apr
  4. 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey20 Dec
  5. 2022ROSCOE: A Suite of Metrics for Scoring Step-by-Step Reasoning15 Dec
  6. 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thought3 Oct
  7. 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic2 Sep
  8. 2022The Unreliability of Explanations in Few-shot Prompting for Textual Reasoning6 May

Other references · 33

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  7. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  8. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  9. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  10. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  11. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  12. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
21 more
  1. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  2. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  3. 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
  4. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
  5. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 420
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  8. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  9. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
  10. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 281
  11. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 275
  12. 2022Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanationscited by 159
  13. 2021Explaining Answers with Entailment Treescited by 148
  14. 2023Human-like Summarization Evaluation with ChatGPTcited by 126
  15. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
  16. 2022NaturalProver: Grounded Mathematical Proof Generation with Language Modelscited by 72
  17. 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
  18. 2023Prompting Large Language Models With the Socratic Methodcited by 43
  19. 2021A Study of Automatic Metrics for the Evaluation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 34
  20. 2021A Training-free and Reference-free Summarization Evaluation Metric via Centrality-weighted Relevance and Self-referenced Redundancycited by 21
  21. 2023Large Language Model for Science: A Study on P vs. NPcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 8; 2025: 10; 2026: 8.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
  2. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
  3. 2024LLM-based NLG Evaluation: Current Status and Challengescited by 71
  4. 2024LLM Reasoners: New Evaluation, Library, and Analysis of Step-by-Step Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 70
  5. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wiselycited by 65
  6. 2025Toward Generalizable Evaluation in the LLM Era: A Survey Beyond Benchmarkscited by 26
  7. 2025Analyzing Uncertainty of LLM-as-a-Judge: Interval Evaluations with Conformal Predictioncited by 26
  8. 2023Mathematical Language Models: A Surveycited by 24
  9. 2025Premise-Augmented Reasoning Chains Improve Error Identification in Math reasoning with LLMscited by 22
  10. 2024An Empirical Analysis on Large Language Models in Debate Evaluationcited by 20
  11. 2024Can We Verify Step by Step for Incorrect Answer Detection?cited by 15
  12. 2024FG-PRM: Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Language Model Mathematical Reasoningcited by 12
15 more
  1. 2025A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Modelscited by 12
  2. 2025Examining False Positives under Inference Scaling for Mathematical Reasoningcited by 11
  3. 2026Rethinking LLM-as-a-Judge: Representation-as-a-Judge with Small Language Models via Semantic Capacity Asymmetrycited by 8
  4. 2026VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluationcited by 7
  5. 2025HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluatorscited by 5
  6. 2025Mitigating Judgment Preference Bias in Large Language Models through Group-Based Pollingcited by 1
  7. 2026Beyond Factual Accuracy: Evaluating Global Reasoning Integrity in RAG Systems with LogicScorecited by 1
  8. 2026Beyond Social Pressure: Benchmarking Epistemic Attack in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  9. 2026Decomposing the Delta: What Do Models Actually Learn from Preference Pairs?cited by 1
  10. 2025Through the LLM Looking Glass: A Socratic Probing of Donkeys, Elephants, and Marketscited by 0
  11. 2025Boosting Process-Correct CoT Reasoning by Modeling Solvability of Multiple-Choice QAcited by 0
  12. 2025Judging by the Rules: Compliance-Aligned Framework for Modern Slavery Statement Monitoringcited by 0
  13. 2026Evaluating the Reliability and Fidelity of Automated Judgment Systems of Large Language Modelscited by 0
  14. 2026PEARL: Training Socratic Tutors with Pedagogically Aligned Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  15. 2026Robust Conformal Consensus: Multi-Agent LLM-as-a-Judge Interval Evaluation with Conformal Predictioncited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024P-FOLIO: Evaluating and Improving Logical Reasoning with Abundant Human-Written Reasoning Chains
  2. 2025SSR: Socratic Self-Refine for Large Language Model Reasoning
  3. 2025Self-Reasoning Language Models: Unfold Hidden Reasoning Chains with Few Reasoning Catalyst
  4. 2023Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance
  5. 2025Beyond Chains of Thought: Benchmarking Latent-Space Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models
  6. 2024Self-Harmonized Chain of Thought
  7. 2025ReFIne: A Framework for Trustworthy Large Reasoning Models with Reliability, Faithfulness, and Interpretability
  8. 2022Teaching Small Language Models to Reason