mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators

arXiv 2502.13031 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Since the adoption of large language models (LLMs) for text evaluation has become increasingly prevalent in the field of natural language processing (NLP), a series of existing works attempt to optimize the prompts for LLM evaluators to improve their alignment with human judgment. However, their efforts are limited to optimizing individual factors of evaluation prompts, such as evaluation criteria or output formats, neglecting the combinatorial impact of multiple factors, which leads to insufficient optimization of the evaluation pipeline. Nevertheless, identifying well-behaved prompting strategies for adjusting multiple factors requires extensive enumeration. To this end, we comprehensively integrate 8 key factors for evaluation prompts and propose a novel automatic prompting strategy optimization method called Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search (HPSS). Inspired by the genetic algorithm, HPSS conducts an iterative search to find well-behaved prompting strategies for LLM evaluators. A heuristic function is employed to guide the search process, enhancing the performance of our algorithm. Extensive experiments across four evaluation tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of HPSS, consistently outperforming both human-designed evaluation prompts and existing automatic prompt optimization methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/thu-coai/HPSS.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2025.

Builds on

38 of 66 references.

References · 38

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  6. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
  7. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 742
  8. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  9. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 653
  10. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
  11. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  12. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 302
26 more
  1. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 277
  2. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  3. 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
  4. 2024Aligning with Human Judgement: The Role of Pairwise Preference in Large Language Model Evaluatorscited by 149
  5. 2015Semantically Conditioned LSTM-based Natural Language Generation for Spoken Dialogue Systemscited by 134
  6. 2024Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessmentcited by 126
  7. 2023Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversationscited by 89
  8. 2023Exploring the Use of Large Language Models for Reference-Free Text Quality Evaluation: An Empirical Studycited by 85
  9. 2022Of Human Criteria and Automatic Metrics: A Benchmark of the Evaluation of Story Generationcited by 75
  10. 2023CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generationcited by 66
  11. 2023Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Text Summarization with In-Context Learningcited by 44
  12. 2023The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?cited by 44
  13. 2024Are LLM-based Evaluators Confusing NLG Quality Criteria?cited by 36
  14. 2024Evaluating the Evaluator: Measuring LLMs' Adherence to Task Evaluation Instructionscited by 34
  15. 2024HD-Eval: Aligning Large Language Model Evaluators Through Hierarchical Criteria Decompositioncited by 33
  16. 2024Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklistscited by 32
  17. 2023SocREval: Large Language Models with the Socratic Method for Reference-Free Reasoning Evaluationcited by 27
  18. 2024RevisEval: Improving LLM-as-a-Judge via Response-Adapted Referencescited by 20
  19. 2023Survival of the Most Influential Prompts: Efficient Black-Box Prompt Search via Clustering and Pruningcited by 17
  20. 2024One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary Evaluationcited by 16
  21. 2024Can Many-Shot In-Context Learning Help LLMs as Evaluators? A Preliminary Empirical Studycited by 15
  22. 2023Which is better? Exploring Prompting Strategy For LLM-based Metricscited by 14
  23. 2024A Better LLM Evaluator for Text Generation: The Impact of Prompt Output Sequencing and Optimizationcited by 11
  24. 2024Check-Eval: A Checklist-based Approach for Evaluating Text Qualitycited by 11
  25. 2023Little Giants: Exploring the Potential of Small LLMs as Evaluation Metrics in Summarization in the Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Taskcited by 8
  26. 2023DecompEval: Evaluating Generated Texts as Unsupervised Decomposed Question Answeringcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.