Self-Harmonized Chain of Thought
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has demonstrated the capacity of large language models to perform complex reasoning through intermediate steps. While effective, current CoT methods face challenges: Zero-shot-CoT can lead to reasoning errors, and Few-shot-CoT requires labor-intensive manual demonstrations. Auto-CoT attempts to address these issues by automatically generating diverse demonstrations, but this diversity can lead to inconsistent reasoning patterns. We propose ECHO (Self-Harmonized Chain of Thought), a novel method that unifies diverse solution paths into a consistent and effective reasoning pattern. ECHO employs an iterative process to refine and harmonize automatically generated demonstrations, mitigating the limitations of existing approaches. Our comprehensive experiments across arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks demonstrate that ECHO outperforms Auto-CoT by an average of 2.8%. These findings suggest that ECHO represents a significant step towards more robust and generalizable automated reasoning in large language models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2024.
Builds on
10 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models6 May
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks22 Nov
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners24 May
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models21 May
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan
Other references · 4
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 16
- 2025Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2024Blind Spot Navigation in Large Language Model Reasoning with Thought Space Explorercited by 7
- 2026The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modescited by 0
- 2026The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes9 Jun 2026
- 2025Benchmarking Multi-Step Legal Reasoning and Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Effects in Large Language Models11 Nov 2025
- 2025Causal Sufficiency and Necessity Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning11 Jun 2025
- 2024Blind Spot Navigation in Large Language Model Reasoning with Thought Space Explorer31 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters
- 2024Break the Chain: Large Language Models Can be Shortcut Reasoners
- 2024Enhancing Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Reasoning Patterns
- 2023Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models
- 2024A Theoretical Understanding of Chain-of-Thought: Coherent Reasoning and Error-Aware Demonstration
- 2026Hierarchical Chain-of-Thought: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Performance and Efficiency
- 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Models
- 2023Large Language Models as Analogical Reasoners