mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReFIne: A Framework for Trustworthy Large Reasoning Models with Reliability, Faithfulness, and Interpretability

arXiv 2510.09062 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have largely prioritized answer accuracy and token efficiency, while overlooking aspects critical to trustworthiness. We argue that usable reasoning systems must be trustworthy, characterized by three properties: interpretability, faithfulness, and reliability. To this end, we propose ReFIne, a new training framework that integrates supervised fine-tuning with GRPO to encourage models to: (i) improve interpretability by producing structured, tag-based traces with high-level planning that are easier for humans to follow; (ii) enhance faithfulness by explicitly disclosing the decisive information guiding each solution, with consistent cross-section references; and (iii) promote reliability by providing self-assessments of both the derivation's soundness and the confidence of the final answer. We apply ReFIne to the Qwen3 models at multiple scales (1.7B/4B/8B) and evaluate across mathematical benchmarks of varying difficulty. Our experimental results show that ReFIne models generate clearer and better-structured reasoning traces (interpretability +44.0%), more faithfully expose their underlying decision process (faithfulness +18.8%), and offer informative confidence estimates (reliability +42.4%). These findings highlight an overlooked but important direction: reasoning models should be optimized not only for accuracy, but also for broader dimensions of trustworthiness. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Training_Trustworthy_LRM_with_Refine

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

20 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Reasoning about Uncertainty: Do Reasoning Models Know When They Don't Know?22 Jun
  2. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models20 Mar
  3. 2025s1: Simple test-time scaling31 Jan
  4. 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan

Other references · 16

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  5. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  6. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
  7. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
  8. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
  9. 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
  10. 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attackscited by 145
  11. 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 117
  12. 2024Concept Bottleneck Large Language Modelscited by 43
4 more
  1. 2025Mixture of Experts Made Intrinsically Interpretablecited by 24
  2. 2024Iterative Self-Tuning LLMs for Enhanced Jailbreaking Capabilitiescited by 17
  3. 2025HoT: Highlighted Chain of Thought for Referencing Supporting Facts from Inputscited by 9
  4. 2025Enhancing Large Language Models through Structured Reasoningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RFEval: Benchmarking Reasoning Faithfulness under Counterfactual Reasoning Intervention in Large Reasoning Models
  2. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models
  3. 2025Red Teaming Large Reasoning Models
  4. 2026Shorter, but Still Trustworthy? An Empirical Study of Chain-of-Thought Compression
  5. 2026Does Reasoning Preserve Alignment? On the Trustworthiness of Large Reasoning Models
  6. 2026Hint Tuning: Less Data Makes Better Reasoners
  7. 2025Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens
  8. 2026REIN: Bridging the Gap between Reasoning and Reliability via Reflection and Abstention Alignment