May I Ask a Follow-up Question? Understanding the Benefits of Conversations in Neural Network Explainability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Research in explainable AI (XAI) aims to provide insights into the decision-making process of opaque AI models. To date, most XAI methods offer one-off and static explanations, which cannot cater to the diverse backgrounds and understanding levels of users. With this paper, we investigate if free-form conversations can enhance users' comprehension of static explanations, improve acceptance and trust in the explanation methods, and facilitate human-AI collaboration. Participants are presented with static explanations, followed by a conversation with a human expert regarding the explanations. We measure the effect of the conversation on participants' ability to choose, from three machine learning models, the most accurate one based on explanations and their self-reported comprehension, acceptance, and trust. Empirical results show that conversations significantly improve comprehension, acceptance, trust, and collaboration. Our findings highlight the importance of customized model explanations in the format of free-form conversations and provide insights for the future design of conversational explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 81 of its 170 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.
Builds on
81 of 170 references.
References · 81
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
38 more
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 766
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2023MultiModal-GPT: A Vision and Language Model for Dialogue with Humanscited by 255
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2016A Network-based End-to-End Trainable Task-oriented Dialogue Systemcited by 252
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 233
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2022BlenderBot 3: a deployed conversational agent that continually learns to responsibly engagecited by 198
- 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
- 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
- 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 147
- 2020Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanationscited by 142
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
- 2021Recent Advances in Deep Learning Based Dialogue Systems: A Systematic Surveycited by 130
- 2020The Language Interpretability Tool: Extensible, Interactive Visualizations and Analysis for NLP Modelscited by 125
- 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
- 2019Data Valuation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 116
- 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 88
- 2017Frames: A Corpus for Adding Memory to Goal-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 85
- 2021A Survey on Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering: Methods, Challenges and Solutionscited by 78
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderationcited by 67
- 2023Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 67
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
50 most cited of 81 All 81 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Reviewcited by 34
- 2024Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracycited by 5
- 2025Conversational Explanations: Discussing Explainable AI with Non-AI Expertscited by 1
- 2026Exploring Plan Space through Conversation: An Agentic Framework for LLM-Mediated Explanations in Planningcited by 0
- 2026Towards Faithful Agentic XAI: A Verification Method and an Open-World Benchmark for Better Model Faithfulnesscited by 0
- 2026Towards Faithful Agentic XAI: A Verification Method and an Open-World Benchmark for Better Model Faithfulness27 May 2026
- 2026Exploring Plan Space through Conversation: An Agentic Framework for LLM-Mediated Explanations in Planning2 Mar 2026
- 2025Conversational Explanations: Discussing Explainable AI with Non-AI Experts16 Feb 2025
- 2024Allowing humans to interactively guide machines where to look does not always improve human-AI team's classification accuracy8 Apr 2024
- 2024Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Review15 Mar 2024