Conversational Explanations: Discussing Explainable AI with Non-AI Experts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable AI (XAI) aims to provide insights into the decisions made by AI models. To date, most XAI approaches provide only one-time, static explanations, which cannot cater to users' diverse knowledge levels and information needs. Conversational explanations have been proposed as an effective method to customize XAI explanations. However, building conversational explanation systems is hindered by the scarcity of training data. Training with synthetic data faces two main challenges: lack of data diversity and hallucination in the generated data. To alleviate these issues, we introduce a repetition penalty to promote data diversity and exploit a hallucination detector to filter out untruthful synthetic conversation turns. We conducted both automatic and human evaluations on the proposed system, fEw-shot Multi-round ConvErsational Explanation (EMCEE). For automatic evaluation, EMCEE achieves relative improvements of 81.6% in BLEU and 80.5% in ROUGE compared to the baselines. EMCEE also mitigates the degeneration of data quality caused by training on synthetic data. In human evaluations (N=60), EMCEE outperforms baseline models and the control group in improving users' comprehension, acceptance, trust, and collaboration with static explanations by large margins. Through a fine-grained analysis of model responses, we further demonstrate that training on self-generated synthetic data improves the model's ability to generate more truthful and understandable answers, leading to better user interactions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first conversational explanation method that can answer free-form user questions following static explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2025.
Builds on
58 of 99 references.
References · 58
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
38 more
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 260
- 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
- 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 222
- 2022ZeroGen: Efficient Zero-shot Learning via Dataset Generationcited by 211
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2022Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 202
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLPcited by 200
- 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
- 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
- 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
- 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2020Explaining NLP Models via Minimal Contrastive Editing (MiCE)cited by 106
- 2022Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanationscited by 92
- 2023Large Language Models Suffer From Their Own Output: An Analysis of the Self-Consuming Training Loopcited by 79
- 2022Plausible May Not Be Faithful: Probing Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 72
- 2022ProGen: Progressive Zero-shot Dataset Generation via In-context Feedbackcited by 67
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
- 2016Scalable Bayesian Rule Listscited by 64
- 2022"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interactioncited by 63
- 2021On the Frequency Bias of Generative Modelscited by 60
- 2017A causal framework for explaining the predictions of black-box sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 58
- 2023ROBBIE: Robust Bias Evaluation of Large Generative Language Modelscited by 53
- 2021HYDRA: Hypergradient Data Relevance Analysis for Interpreting Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
- 2024Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Reviewcited by 34
- 2023A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspectivecited by 33
- 2023ConvXAI: Delivering Heterogeneous AI Explanations via Conversations to Support Human-AI Scientific Writingcited by 31
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.