"It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) repeatedly match or outperform radiologists in lab experiments. However, real-world implementations of radiological AI-based systems are found to provide little to no clinical value. This paper explores how to design AI for clinical usefulness in different contexts. We conducted 19 design sessions and design interventions with 13 radiologists from 7 clinical sites in Denmark and Kenya, based on three iterations of a functional AI-based prototype. Ten sociotechnical dependencies were identified as crucial for the design of AI in radiology. We conceptualised four technical dimensions that must be configured to the intended clinical context of use: AI functionality, AI medical focus, AI decision threshold, and AI Explainability. We present four design recommendations on how to address dependencies pertaining to the medical knowledge, clinic type, user expertise level, patient context, and user situation that condition the configuration of these technical dimensions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.
Builds on
20 of 99 references.
References · 20
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
- 2020VinDr-CXR: An open dataset of chest X-rays with radiologist's annotationscited by 236
- 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 182
- 2020Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scanscited by 158
- 2019Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms during Medical Decision-Makingcited by 109
- 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
- 2022Human-Algorithm Collaboration: Achieving Complementarity and Avoiding Unfairnesscited by 45
- 2024Multimodal Healthcare AI: Identifying and Designing Clinically Relevant Vision-Language Applications for Radiologycited by 45
- 2020CheXplain: Enabling Physicians to Explore and UnderstandData-Driven, AI-Enabled Medical Imaging Analysiscited by 40
- 2019"The Human Body is a Black Box": Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learningcited by 39
- 2021Designing AI for Trust and Collaboration in Time-Constrained Medical Decisions: A Sociotechnical Lenscited by 35
- 2022Who Goes First? Influences of Human-AI Workflow on Decision Making in Clinical Imagingcited by 32
8 more
- 2021"Brilliant AI Doctor" in Rural China: Tensions and Challenges in AI-Powered CDSS Deploymentcited by 28
- 2023Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Makingcited by 18
- 2021Modeling Assumptions Clash with the Real World: Transparency, Equity, and Community Challenges for Student Assignment Algorithmscited by 11
- 2023Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AIcited by 11
- 2020Lessons Learned from Designing an AI-Enabled Diagnosis Tool for Pathologistscited by 9
- 2022Holding AI to Account: Challenges for the Delivery of Trustworthy AI in Healthcarecited by 9
- 2023"If I Had All the Time in the World": Ophthalmologists' Perceptions of Anchoring Bias Mitigation in Clinical AI Supportcited by 5
- 2018CarePre: An Intelligent Clinical Decision Assistance Systemcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.