mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effect of Radiology Report Labeler Quality on Deep Learning Models for Chest X-Ray Interpretation

arXiv 2104.00793 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although deep learning models for chest X-ray interpretation are commonly trained on labels generated by automatic radiology report labelers, the impact of improvements in report labeling on the performance of chest X-ray classification models has not been systematically investigated. We first compare the CheXpert, CheXbert, and VisualCheXbert labelers on the task of extracting accurate chest X-ray image labels from radiology reports, reporting that the VisualCheXbert labeler outperforms the CheXpert and CheXbert labelers. Next, after training image classification models using labels generated from the different radiology report labelers on one of the largest datasets of chest X-rays, we show that an image classification model trained on labels from the VisualCheXbert labeler outperforms image classification models trained on labels from the CheXpert and CheXbert labelers. Our work suggests that recent improvements in radiology report labeling can translate to the development of higher performing chest X-ray classification models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2021.

Builds on

3 of 4 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,410
  2. 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 590
  3. 2020CheXbert: Combining Automatic Labelers and Expert Annotations for Accurate Radiology Report Labeling Using BERTcited by 329

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.

2 papers.