mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Toward Trustworthy Evaluation of Sustainability Rating Methodologies: A Human-AI Collaborative Framework for Benchmark Dataset Construction

arXiv 2602.17106 ↗First posted 19 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sustainability or ESG rating agencies use company disclosures and external data to produce scores or ratings that assess the environmental, social, and governance performance of a company. However, sustainability ratings across agencies for a single company vary widely, limiting their comparability, credibility, and relevance to decision-making. To harmonize the rating results, we propose adopting a universal human-AI collaboration framework to generate trustworthy benchmark datasets for evaluating sustainability rating methodologies. The framework comprises two complementary parts: STRIDE (Sustainability Trust Rating & Integrity Data Equation) provides principled criteria and a scoring system that guide the construction of firm-level benchmark datasets using large language models (LLMs), and SR-Delta, a discrepancy-analysis procedural framework that surfaces insights for potential adjustments. The framework enables scalable and comparable assessment of sustainability rating methodologies. We call on the broader AI community to adopt AI-powered approaches to strengthen and advance sustainability rating methodologies that support and enforce urgent sustainability agendas.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 90 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  2. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
  3. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  4. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
  5. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  6. 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
  7. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 182
  8. 2020Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claimscited by 163
  9. 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 100
  10. 2022Mapping global dynamics of benchmark creation and saturation in artificial intelligencecited by 71
  11. 2021Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systemscited by 30
  12. 2025The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systemscited by 24
9 more
  1. 2023ESGReveal: An LLM-based approach for extracting structured data from ESG reportscited by 15
  2. 2023Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AIcited by 11
  3. 2025ESGenius: Benchmarking LLMs on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Sustainability Knowledgecited by 8
  4. 2023Glitter or Gold? Deriving Structured Insights from Sustainability Reports via Large Language Modelscited by 6
  5. 2023Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collectioncited by 5
  6. 2024CleanGraph: Human-in-the-loop Knowledge Graph Refinement and Completioncited by 4
  7. 2025Structuring the Unstructured: A Multi-Agent System for Extracting and Querying Financial KPIs and Guidancecited by 2
  8. 2023Evaluating machine learning models in non-standard settings: An overview and new findingscited by 1
  9. 2025Human and AI Trust: Trust Attitude Measurement Instrumentcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.