Learning to Recover for Safe Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Safety controllers is widely used to achieve safe reinforcement learning. Most methods that apply a safety controller are using handcrafted safety constraints to construct the safety controller. However, when the environment dynamics are sophisticated, handcrafted safety constraints become unavailable. Therefore, it worth to research on constructing safety controllers by learning algorithms. We propose a three-stage architecture for safe reinforcement learning, namely TU-Recovery Architecture. A safety critic and a recovery policy is learned before task training. They form a safety controller to ensure safety in task training. Then a phenomenon induced by disagreement between task policy and recovery policy, called adversarial phenomenon, which reduces learning efficiency and model performance, is described. Auxiliary reward is proposed to mitigate adversarial phenomenon, while help the task policy to learn to recover from high-risk states. A series of experiments are conducted in a robot navigation environment. Experiments demonstrate that TU-Recovery outperforms unconstrained counterpart in both reward gaining and constraint violations during task training, and auxiliary reward further improve TU-Recovery in reward-to-cost ratio by significantly reduce constraint violations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.
Builds on
27 of 33 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
- 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
- 2015Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteriacited by 320
15 more
- 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 256
- 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
- 2020Projection-Based Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 195
- 2022A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applicationscited by 169
- 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
- 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 129
- 2018Episodic Curiosity through Reachabilitycited by 109
- 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning in Constrained Markov Decision Processescited by 109
- 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 109
- 2017Trial without Error: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Human Interventioncited by 102
- 2017Leave no Trace: Learning to Reset for Safe and Autonomous Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
- 2019Convergent Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
- 2021Context-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Non-Stationary Environmentscited by 33
- 2022Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with a Safety Editor Policycited by 28
- 2021DESTA: A Framework for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Markov Games of Interventioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.