mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DESTA: A Framework for Safe Reinforcement Learning with Markov Games of Intervention

arXiv 2110.14468 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) involves performing exploratory actions in an unknown system. This can place a learning agent in dangerous and potentially catastrophic system states. Current approaches for tackling safe learning in RL simultaneously trade-off safe exploration and task fulfillment. In this paper, we introduce a new generation of RL solvers that learn to minimise safety violations while maximising the task reward to the extent that can be tolerated by the safe policy. Our approach introduces a novel two-player framework for safe RL called Distributive Exploration Safety Training Algorithm (DESTA). The core of DESTA is a game between two adaptive agents: Safety Agent that is delegated the task of minimising safety violations and Task Agent whose goal is to maximise the environment reward. Specifically, Safety Agent can selectively take control of the system at any given point to prevent safety violations while Task Agent is free to execute its policy at any other states. This framework enables Safety Agent to learn to take actions at certain states that minimise future safety violations, both during training and testing time, while Task Agent performs actions that maximise the task performance everywhere else. Theoretically, we prove that DESTA converges to stable points enabling safety violations of pretrained policies to be minimised. Empirically, we show DESTA's ability to augment the safety of existing policies and secondly, construct safe RL policies when the Task Agent and Safety Agent are trained concurrently. We demonstrate DESTA's superior performance against leading RL methods in Lunar Lander and Frozen Lake from OpenAI gym.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.

Builds on

27 of 51 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  3. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  4. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  5. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  6. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  7. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  8. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  9. 2017A General Safety Framework for Learning-Based Control in Uncertain Robotic Systemscited by 150
  10. 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
  11. 2018Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Explorationcited by 116
  12. 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 109
15 more
  1. 2020Conservative Safety Critics for Explorationcited by 107
  2. 2017Multiagent Bidirectionally-Coordinated Nets: Emergence of Human-level Coordination in Learning to Play StarCraft Combat Gamescited by 93
  3. 2020Game-Theoretic Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 92
  4. 2017Uncertainty-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Collision Avoidancecited by 86
  5. 2017Leave no Trace: Learning to Reset for Safe and Autonomous Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
  6. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Inductioncited by 73
  7. 2018How Many Random Seeds? Statistical Power Analysis in Deep Reinforcement Learning Experimentscited by 56
  8. 2019Worst Cases Policy Gradientscited by 52
  9. 2021Multi-Agent Constrained Policy Optimisationcited by 32
  10. 2018Safely Learning to Control the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulatorcited by 31
  11. 2020SAMBA: Safe Model-Based & Active Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  12. 2021On the Complexity of Computing Markov Perfect Equilibrium in General-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 18
  13. 2018A Viscosity Approach to Stochastic Differential Games of Control and Stopping Involving Impulsive Controlcited by 5
  14. 2019Cutting Your Losses: Learning Fault-Tolerant Control and Optimal Stopping under Adverse Riskcited by 5
  15. 2018Optimal Selection of Transaction Costs in a Dynamic Principal-Agent Problemcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1.

4 papers.