Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study principal-agent problems in which a principal commits to an outcome-dependent payment scheme -- called contract -- in order to induce an agent to take a costly, unobservable action leading to favorable outcomes. We consider a generalization of the classical (single-round) version of the problem in which the principal interacts with the agent by committing to contracts over multiple rounds. The principal has no information about the agent, and they have to learn an optimal contract by only observing the outcome realized at each round. We focus on settings in which the size of the agent's action space is small. We design an algorithm that learns an approximately-optimal contract with high probability in a number of rounds polynomial in the size of the outcome space, when the number of actions is constant. Our algorithm solves an open problem by Zhu et al.[2022]. Moreover, it can also be employed to provide a tildeO(T4/5) regret bound in the related online learning setting in which the principal aims at maximizing their cumulative utility, thus considerably improving previously-known regret bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2023.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adaptive Contract Design for Crowdsourcing Markets: Bandit Algorithms for Repeated Principal-Agent Problemscited by 46
- 2021Sample-Efficient Learning of Stackelberg Equilibria in General-Sum Gamescited by 40
- 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Designcited by 35
- 2018Simple versus Optimal Contractscited by 33
- 2020Contracts under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selectioncited by 21
- 2020The Complexity of Contractscited by 16
- 2022Multi-Agent Contractscited by 14
- 2018Learning Approximately Optimal Contractscited by 12
- 2021Bayesian Agency: Linear versus Tractable Contractscited by 12
- 2021Combinatorial Contractscited by 12
- 2021Contracts with Private Cost per Unit-of-Effortcited by 12
- 2022No-Regret Learning in Dynamic Stackelberg Gamescited by 12
5 more
- 2022Designing Menus of Contracts Efficiently: The Power of Randomizationcited by 10
- 2022Approximate Optimality of Linear Contracts Under Uncertaintycited by 7
- 2023Multi-Agent Contract Design: How to Commission Multiple Agents with Individual Outcomecited by 6
- 2023The Power of Menus in Contract Designcited by 5
- 2023On Supermodular Contracts and Dense Subgraphscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal?cited by 6
- 2025Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyondcited by 3
- 2026Learning in Bayesian Stackelberg Games With Unknown Follower's Typescited by 2
- 2024Contracting With a Reinforcement Learning Agent by Playing Trick or Treatcited by 0
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contractscited by 0
- 2026Learning in Bayesian Stackelberg Games With Unknown Follower's Types31 Jan 2026
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contracts4 Jan 2026
- 2025Regret Minimization for Piecewise Linear Rewards: Contracts, Auctions, and Beyond3 Mar 2025
- 2024Contracting With a Reinforcement Learning Agent by Playing Trick or Treat17 Oct 2024
- 2024Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal?22 Feb 2024