Contracts with Private Cost per Unit-of-Effort
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Economic theory distinguishes between principal-agent settings in which the agent has a private type and settings in which the agent takes a hidden action. Many practical problems, however, involve aspects of both. For example, brand X may seek to hire an influencer Y to create sponsored content to be posted on social media platform Z. This problem has a hidden action component (the brand may not be able or willing to observe the amount of effort exerted by the influencer), but also a private type component (influencers may have different costs per unit-of-effort). This "effort" and "cost per unit-of-effort" perspective naturally leads to a principal-agent problem with hidden action and single-dimensional private type, which generalizes both the classic principal-agent hidden action model of contract theory `a la Grossman and Hart [1983] and the (procurement version) of single-dimensional mechanism design `a la Myerson [1981]. A natural goal in this model is to design an incentive-compatible contract, which consist of an allocation rule that maps types to actions, and a payment rule that maps types to payments for the stochastic outcomes of the chosen action. Our main contribution is a linear programming (LP) duality based characterization of implementable allocation rules for this model, which applies to both discrete and continuous types. This characterization shares important features of Myerson's celebrated characterization result, but also departs from it in significant ways. We present several applications, including a polynomial-time algorithm for finding the optimal contract with a constant number of actions. This is in sharp contrast to recent work on hidden action problems with multi-dimensional private information, which has shown that the problem of computing an optimal contract for constant numbers of actions is APX-hard.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Nov 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Designcited by 35
- 2022Principal-Agent Hypothesis Testingcited by 13
- 2023Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2023Learning to Incentivize Information Acquisition: Proper Scoring Rules Meet Principal-Agent Modelcited by 7
- 2024Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal?cited by 5
- 2023Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action Spacescited by 4
- 2024Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Handscited by 4
- 2025Fair Contracts in Principal-Agent Games with Heterogeneous Typescited by 1
- 2023Optimal Pricing for Data-Augmented AutoML Marketplacescited by 0
- 2025Provably Efficient Algorithm for Best Scoring Rule Identification in Online Principal-Agent Information Acquisitioncited by 0
- 2025Scalable Principal-Agent Contract Design via Gradient-Based Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contractscited by 0
- 2026The Optimal Sample Complexity of Linear Contracts4 Jan 2026
- 2025Scalable Principal-Agent Contract Design via Gradient-Based Optimization24 Oct 2025
- 2025Fair Contracts in Principal-Agent Games with Heterogeneous Types18 Jun 2025
- 2025Provably Efficient Algorithm for Best Scoring Rule Identification in Online Principal-Agent Information Acquisition23 May 2025
- 2024Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Hands1 Jul 2024
- 2024Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal?22 Feb 2024
- 2023Optimal Pricing for Data-Augmented AutoML Marketplaces27 Oct 2023
- 2023Learning Optimal Contracts: How to Exploit Small Action Spaces18 Sep 2023
- 2023Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learning4 Sep 2023
- 2023Learning to Incentivize Information Acquisition: Proper Scoring Rules Meet Principal-Agent Model15 Mar 2023
- 2022The Sample Complexity of Online Contract Design10 Nov 2022
- 2022Principal-Agent Hypothesis Testing13 May 2022