Automatic Feature Engineering for Time Series Classification: Evaluation and Discussion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time Series Classification (TSC) has received much attention in the past two decades and is still a crucial and challenging problem in data science and knowledge engineering. Indeed, along with the increasing availability of time series data, many TSC algorithms have been suggested by the research community in the literature. Besides state-of-the-art methods based on similarity measures, intervals, shapelets, dictionaries, deep learning methods or hybrid ensemble methods, several tools for extracting unsupervised informative summary statistics, aka features, from time series have been designed in the recent years. Originally designed for descriptive analysis and visualization of time series with informative and interpretable features, very few of these feature engineering tools have been benchmarked for TSC problems and compared with state-of-the-art TSC algorithms in terms of predictive performance. In this article, we aim at filling this gap and propose a simple TSC process to evaluate the potential predictive performance of the feature sets obtained with existing feature engineering tools. Thus, we present an empirical study of 11 feature engineering tools branched with 9 supervised classifiers over 112 time series data sets. The analysis of the results of more than 10000 learning experiments indicate that feature-based methods perform as accurately as current state-of-the-art TSC algorithms, and thus should rightfully be considered further in the TSC literature.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2023.
Builds on
25 of 48 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2018Deep learning for time series classification: a reviewcited by 576
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 471
- 2018The UCR Time Series Archivecited by 431
- 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
- 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 339
- 2020MINIROCKET: A Very Fast (Almost) Deterministic Transform for Time Series Classificationcited by 190
- 2021HIVE-COTE 2.0: a new meta ensemble for time series classificationcited by 118
- 2015Should we really use post-hoc tests based on mean-ranks?cited by 116
- 2019catch22: CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristicscited by 105
13 more
- 2019sktime: A Unified Interface for Machine Learning with Time Seriescited by 102
- 2021MultiRocket: Multiple pooling operators and transformations for fast and effective time series classificationcited by 90
- 2013A Time Series Forest for Classification and Feature Extractioncited by 69
- 2019TS-CHIEF: A Scalable and Accurate Forest Algorithm for Time Series Classificationcited by 67
- 2020The Canonical Interval Forest (CIF) Classifier for Time Series Classificationcited by 48
- 2017Fast and Accurate Time Series Classification with WEASELcited by 47
- 2013Highly comparative time-series analysis: The empirical structure of time series and their methodscited by 30
- 2016Distributed and parallel time series feature extraction for industrial big data applicationscited by 30
- 2021The Temporal Dictionary Ensemble (TDE) Classifier for Time Series Classificationcited by 26
- 2019Scalable Dictionary Classifiers for Time Series Classificationcited by 20
- 2022The FreshPRINCE: A Simple Transformation Based Pipeline Time Series Classifiercited by 18
- 2018From BOP to BOSS and Beyond: Time Series Classification with Dictionary Based Classifierscited by 14
- 2018Is rotation forest the best classifier for problems with continuous features?cited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.