mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

"Tidy Up the Table": Grounding Common-sense Objective for Tabletop Object Rearrangement

arXiv 2307.11319 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2023cs.RO cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tidying up a messy table may appear simple for humans, but articulating clear criteria for tidiness is challenging due to the ambiguous nature of common sense reasoning. Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven capable of capturing common sense knowledge to reason over this vague concept of tidiness. However, they alone may struggle with table tidying due to the limited grasp on the spatio-visual aspects of tidiness. In this work, we aim to ground the common-sense concept of tidiness within the context of object arrangement. Our survey reveals that humans usually factorize tidiness into semantic and visual-spatial tidiness; our grounding approach aligns with this decomposition. We connect a language-based policy generator with an image-based tidiness score function: the policy generator utilizes the LLM's commonsense knowledge to cluster objects by their implicit types and functionalities for semantic tidiness; meanwhile, the tidiness score function assesses the visual-spatial relations of the object to achieve visual-spatial tidiness. Our tidiness score is trained using synthetic data generated cheaply from customized random walks, which inherently encode the order of tidiness, thereby bypassing the need for labor-intensive human demonstrations. The simulated experiment shows that our approach successfully generates tidy arrangements, predominately in 2D, with potential for 3D stacking, for tables with various novel objects.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.

Builds on

36 of 43 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  5. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  6. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  7. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  8. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  9. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  10. 2022Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agentscited by 1,029
  11. 2021Show Your Work: Scratchpads for Intermediate Computation with Language Modelscited by 871
  12. 2021CLIPort: What and Where Pathways for Robotic Manipulationcited by 617
24 more
  1. 2022Perceiver-Actor: A Multi-Task Transformer for Robotic Manipulationcited by 545
  2. 2021Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitatcited by 501
  3. 2018VirtualHome: Simulating Household Activities via Programscited by 411
  4. 2020Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulationcited by 342
  5. 2023Text2Motion: From Natural Language Instructions to Feasible Planscited by 223
  6. 2023TidyBot: Personalized Robot Assistance with Large Language Modelscited by 219
  7. 2022Interactive Language: Talking to Robots in Real Timecited by 217
  8. 2021iGibson 2.0: Object-Centric Simulation for Robot Learning of Everyday Household Taskscited by 191
  9. 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
  10. 2020Rearrangement: A Challenge for Embodied AIcited by 153
  11. 2019kPAM: KeyPoint Affordances for Category-Level Robotic Manipulationcited by 152
  12. 2022What Matters in Language Conditioned Robotic Imitation Learning over Unstructured Datacited by 137
  13. 2021Visual Room Rearrangementcited by 101
  14. 2021The ThreeDWorld Transport Challenge: A Visually Guided Task-and-Motion Planning Benchmark for Physically Realistic Embodied AIcited by 64
  15. 2021StructFormer: Learning Spatial Structure for Language-Guided Semantic Rearrangement of Novel Objectscited by 57
  16. 2022SE(3)-Equivariant Relational Rearrangement with Neural Descriptor Fieldscited by 51
  17. 2022StructDiffusion: Language-Guided Creation of Physically-Valid Structures using Unseen Objectscited by 49
  18. 2021SORNet: Spatial Object-Centric Representations for Sequential Manipulationcited by 48
  19. 2020Object Rearrangement Using Learned Implicit Collision Functionscited by 43
  20. 2021NeRP: Neural Rearrangement Planning for Unknown Objectscited by 33
  21. 2020A Long Horizon Planning Framework for Manipulating Rigid Pointcloud Objectscited by 22
  22. 2021Semantically Grounded Object Matching for Robust Robotic Scene Rearrangementcited by 21
  23. 2021Leveraging the Inductive Bias of Large Language Models for Abstract Textual Reasoningcited by 18
  24. 2022Differentiable Parsing and Visual Grounding of Natural Language Instructions for Object Placementcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LangPert: Detecting and Handling Task-level Perturbations for Robust Object Rearrangement
  2. 2026TableVision: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Spatially Grounded Reasoning over Complex Hierarchical Tables
  3. 2023LEGO-Net: Learning Regular Rearrangements of Objects in Rooms
  4. 2025Vision language models are unreliable at trivial spatial cognition
  5. 2024LayoutVLM: Differentiable Optimization of 3D Layout via Vision-Language Models
  6. 2024"Set It Up!": Functional Object Arrangement with Compositional Generative Models
  7. 2026GUI-Primitives: Diagnosing Spatial Reasoning Failures in Vision-Language GUI Grounding
  8. 2026SpatialImaginer: Towards Adaptive Visual Imagination for Spatial Reasoning