mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

arXiv 2307.06564 ↗First posted 13 Jul 2023cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prescriptive process monitoring methods seek to optimize the performance of business processes by triggering interventions at runtime, thereby increasing the probability of positive case outcomes. These interventions are triggered according to an intervention policy. Reinforcement learning has been put forward as an approach to learning intervention policies through trial and error. Existing approaches in this space assume that the number of resources available to perform interventions in a process is unlimited, an unrealistic assumption in practice. This paper argues that, in the presence of resource constraints, a key dilemma in the field of prescriptive process monitoring is to trigger interventions based not only on predictions of their necessity, timeliness, or effect but also on the uncertainty of these predictions and the level of resource utilization. Indeed, committing scarce resources to an intervention when the necessity or effects of this intervention are highly uncertain may intuitively lead to suboptimal intervention effects. Accordingly, the paper proposes a reinforcement learning approach for prescriptive process monitoring that leverages conformal prediction techniques to consider the uncertainty of the predictions upon which an intervention decision is based. An evaluation using real-life datasets demonstrates that explicitly modeling uncertainty using conformal predictions helps reinforcement learning agents converge towards policies with higher net intervention gain

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2023.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
  3. 2020Conformal Inference of Counterfactuals and Individual Treatment Effectscited by 151
  4. 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
  5. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  6. 2020Uncertainty in Gradient Boosting via Ensemblescited by 56
  7. 2020RealCause: Realistic Causal Inference Benchmarkingcited by 46
  8. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
  9. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  10. 2019Fire Now, Fire Later: Alarm-Based Systems for Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 18
  11. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
  12. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approachcited by 12
7 more
  1. 2022When to intervene? Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Uncertainty and Resource Constraintscited by 11
  2. 2022Outcome-Oriented Prescriptive Process Monitoring Based on Temporal Logic Patternscited by 7
  3. 2023Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  4. 2022Intervening With Confidence: Conformal Prescriptive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 5
  5. 2021Learning Uncertainty with Artificial Neural Networks for Improved Remaining Time Prediction of Business Processescited by 4
  6. 2023Automatically Reconciling the Trade-off between Prediction Accuracy and Earliness in Prescriptive Business Process Monitoringcited by 4
  7. 2023Timing Process Interventions with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.