mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Outcome-Oriented Prescriptive Process Monitoring Based on Temporal Logic Patterns

arXiv 2211.04880 ↗First posted 9 Nov 2022cs.AI cs.LOcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prescriptive Process Monitoring systems recommend, during the execution of a business process, interventions that, if followed, prevent a negative outcome of the process. Such interventions have to be reliable, that is, they have to guarantee the achievement of the desired outcome or performance, and they have to be flexible, that is, they have to avoid overturning the normal process execution or forcing the execution of a given activity. Most of the existing Prescriptive Process Monitoring solutions, however, while performing well in terms of recommendation reliability, provide the users with very specific (sequences of) activities that have to be executed without caring about the feasibility of these recommendations. In order to face this issue, we propose a new Outcome-Oriented Prescriptive Process Monitoring system recommending temporal relations between activities that have to be guaranteed during the process execution in order to achieve a desired outcome. This softens the mandatory execution of an activity at a given point in time, thus leaving more freedom to the user in deciding the interventions to put in place. Our approach defines these temporal relations with Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces patterns that are used as features to describe the historical process data recorded in an event log by the information systems supporting the execution of the process. Such encoded log is used to train a Machine Learning classifier to learn a mapping between the temporal patterns and the outcome of a process execution. The classifier is then queried at runtime to return as recommendations the most salient temporal patterns to be satisfied to maximize the likelihood of a certain outcome for an input ongoing process execution. The proposed system is assessed using a pool of 22 real-life event logs that have already been used as a benchmark in the Process Mining community.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Nov 2022.

Builds on

11 of 64 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmarkcited by 37
  2. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  3. 2019Fire Now, Fire Later: Alarm-Based Systems for Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 18
  4. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
  5. 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  6. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
  7. 2015Conformance Checking Based on Multi-Perspective Declarative Process Modelscited by 13
  8. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approachcited by 12
  9. 2022When to intervene? Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Uncertainty and Resource Constraintscited by 11
  10. 2022An Explainable Decision Support System for Predictive Process Analyticscited by 8
  11. 2019Trepan Reloaded: A Knowledge-driven Approach to Explaining Artificial Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.

7 papers.