Intervening With Confidence: Conformal Prescriptive Monitoring of Business Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prescriptive process monitoring methods seek to improve the performance of a process by selectively triggering interventions at runtime (e.g., offering a discount to a customer) to increase the probability of a desired case outcome (e.g., a customer making a purchase). The backbone of a prescriptive process monitoring method is an intervention policy, which determines for which cases and when an intervention should be executed. Existing methods in this field rely on predictive models to define intervention policies; specifically, they consider policies that trigger an intervention when the estimated probability of a negative outcome exceeds a threshold. However, the probabilities computed by a predictive model may come with a high level of uncertainty (low confidence), leading to unnecessary interventions and, thus, wasted effort. This waste is particularly problematic when the resources available to execute interventions are limited. To tackle this shortcoming, this paper proposes an approach to extend existing prescriptive process monitoring methods with so-called conformal predictions, i.e., predictions with confidence guarantees. An empirical evaluation using real-life public datasets shows that conformal predictions enhance the net gain of prescriptive process monitoring methods under limited resources.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2022.
Builds on
10 of 20 references.
References · 10
- 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
- 2020Conformal Prediction: a Unified Review of Theory and New Challengescited by 118
- 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
- 2019Fire Now, Fire Later: Alarm-Based Systems for Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 18
- 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
- 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
- 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
- 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approachcited by 12
- 2022When to intervene? Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Uncertainty and Resource Constraintscited by 11
- 2022Goal-Oriented Next Best Activity Recommendation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023The WHY in Business Processes: Discovery of Causal Execution Dependenciescited by 7
- 2023Automatically Reconciling the Trade-off between Prediction Accuracy and Earliness in Prescriptive Business Process Monitoringcited by 4
- 2023Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 4
- 2025How Will My Business Process Unfold? Predicting Case Suffixes With Start and End Timestampscited by 0
- 2025SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventionscited by 0
- 2025SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions19 Dec 2025
- 2025How Will My Business Process Unfold? Predicting Case Suffixes With Start and End Timestamps18 Sep 2025
- 2023The WHY in Business Processes: Discovery of Causal Execution Dependencies23 Oct 2023
- 2023Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Reinforcement Learning Approach13 Jul 2023
- 2023Automatically Reconciling the Trade-off between Prediction Accuracy and Earliness in Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring12 Jul 2023