mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Uncertainty with Artificial Neural Networks for Improved Remaining Time Prediction of Business Processes

arXiv 2105.05559 ↗First posted 12 May 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial neural networks will always make a prediction, even when completely uncertain and regardless of the consequences. This obliviousness of uncertainty is a major obstacle towards their adoption in practice. Techniques exist, however, to estimate the two major types of uncertainty: model uncertainty and observation noise in the data. Bayesian neural networks are theoretically well-founded models that can learn the model uncertainty of their predictions. Minor modifications to these models and their loss functions allow learning the observation noise for individual samples as well. This paper is the first to apply these techniques to predictive process monitoring. We found that they contribute towards more accurate predictions and work quickly. However, their main benefit resides with the uncertainty estimates themselves that allow the separation of higher-quality from lower-quality predictions and the building of confidence intervals. This leads to many interesting applications, enables an earlier adoption of prediction systems with smaller datasets and fosters a better cooperation with humans.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2021.

Builds on

12 of 20 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,476
  5. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
  6. 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
  7. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  8. 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
  9. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  10. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  11. 2017LSTM Networks for Data-Aware Remaining Time Prediction of Business Process Instancescited by 19
  12. 2021Process Outcome Prediction: CNN vs. LSTM (with Attention)cited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

4 papers.