mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SCOPE: Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions

arXiv 2512.17629 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prescriptive Process Monitoring (PresPM) recommends interventions during running business processes to optimize key performance indicators (KPIs). In realistic settings, interventions are rarely isolated: organizations need to align sequences of interventions to jointly steer the outcome of a case. Existing PresPM approaches only partially address this challenge. Many focus on a single intervention decision, while others treat multiple interventions independently, ignoring how they interact over time. Methods that do address these dependencies depend either on simulation or data augmentation to approximate the process to train a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent, which may create a reality gap and introduce bias. We introduce SCOPE (Sequential Causal Optimization of Process Interventions), a PresPM approach that learns aligned sequential intervention recommendations. SCOPE employs backward induction to estimate the effect of each candidate intervention action, propagating its impact from the final decision point back to the first. By leveraging causal learners, our method can utilize observational data directly, unlike methods that require constructing process approximations for RL. Experiments on both an existing synthetic dataset and a new semi-synthetic dataset show that SCOPE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art PresPM techniques in optimizing the KPI. The novel semi-synthetic setup, based on a real-life event log, is provided as a reusable benchmark for future work on sequential PresPM.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2021Nonparametric Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: From Theory to Learning Algorithmscited by 144
  2. 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
  3. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  4. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
  5. 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  6. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
  7. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Causal Inference Approachcited by 12
  8. 2022Comparison of meta-learners for estimating multi-valued treatment heterogeneous effectscited by 10
  9. 2024IGC-Net for conditional average potential outcome estimation over timecited by 10
  10. 2023Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  11. 2022Intervening With Confidence: Conformal Prescriptive Monitoring of Business Processescited by 5
  12. 2023Learning optimal policies from event logs through reinforcement learning: a comparison of deep and MDP-based approachescited by 5
6 more
  1. 2023Prescriptive Process Monitoring Under Resource Constraints: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 4
  2. 2024Optimizing Treatment Allocation in the Presence of Interferencecited by 4
  3. 2025SimBank: from Simulation to Solution in Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 4
  4. 2025Bridging the Reality Gap in Digital Twins with Context-Aware, Physics-Guided Deep Learningcited by 2
  5. 2021Identifying optimally cost-effective dynamic treatment regimes with a Q-learning approachcited by 1
  6. 2025An Innovative Data-Driven and Adaptive Reinforcement Learning Approach for Context-Aware Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.