mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2303.03572 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AI stat.MEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Increasing the success rate of a process, i.e. the percentage of cases that end in a positive outcome, is a recurrent process improvement goal. At runtime, there are often certain actions (a.k.a. treatments) that workers may execute to lift the probability that a case ends in a positive outcome. For example, in a loan origination process, a possible treatment is to issue multiple loan offers to increase the probability that the customer takes a loan. Each treatment has a cost. Thus, when defining policies for prescribing treatments to cases, managers need to consider the net gain of the treatments. Also, the effect of a treatment varies over time: treating a case earlier may be more effective than later in a case. This paper presents a prescriptive monitoring method that automates this decision-making task. The method combines causal inference and reinforcement learning to learn treatment policies that maximize the net gain. The method leverages a conformal prediction technique to speed up the convergence of the reinforcement learning mechanism by separating cases that are likely to end up in a positive or negative outcome, from uncertain cases. An evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2023.

Builds on

14 of 22 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
  3. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 390
  4. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
  5. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  6. 2018Orthogonal Random Forest for Causal Inferencecited by 51
  7. 2020RealCause: Realistic Causal Inference Benchmarkingcited by 44
  8. 2020Prescriptive Business Process Monitoring for Recommending Next Best Actionscited by 22
  9. 2019Fire Now, Fire Later: Alarm-Based Systems for Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 18
  10. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring for Cost-Aware Cycle Time Reductioncited by 17
  11. 2018Alarm-Based Prescriptive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  12. 2020Process Mining Meets Causal Machine Learning: Discovering Causal Rules from Event Logscited by 15
2 more
  1. 2021Prescriptive Process Monitoring: Quo Vadis?cited by 15
  2. 2021Case Level Counterfactual Reasoning in Process Miningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 4.

6 papers.