mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Neural Rendering Methods with Image Augmentations

arXiv 2306.08904 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Faithfully reconstructing 3D geometry and generating novel views of scenes are critical tasks in 3D computer vision. Despite the widespread use of image augmentations across computer vision applications, their potential remains underexplored when learning neural rendering methods (NRMs) for 3D scenes. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the use of image augmentations in NRMs, where we explore different augmentation strategies. We found that introducing image augmentations during training presents challenges such as geometric and photometric inconsistencies for learning NRMs from images. Specifically, geometric inconsistencies arise from alterations in shapes, positions, and orientations from the augmentations, disrupting spatial cues necessary for accurate 3D reconstruction. On the other hand, photometric inconsistencies arise from changes in pixel intensities introduced by the augmentations, affecting the ability to capture the underlying 3D structures of the scene. We alleviate these issues by focusing on color manipulations and introducing learnable appearance embeddings that allow NRMs to explain away photometric variations. Our experiments demonstrate the benefits of incorporating augmentations when learning NRMs, including improved photometric quality and surface reconstruction, as well as enhanced robustness against data quality issues, such as reduced training data and image degradations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2023.

Builds on

24 of 37 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  6. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  7. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  8. 2022DreamFusion: Text-to-3D using 2D Diffusioncited by 3,025
  9. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  10. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
  11. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  12. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,712
12 more
  1. 2019Semantic Image Synthesis with Spatially-Adaptive Normalizationcited by 1,299
  2. 2020NeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collectionscited by 1,232
  3. 2021Volume Rendering of Neural Implicit Surfacescited by 996
  4. 2021Advances in Neural Renderingcited by 365
  5. 2021NeRF in the Dark: High Dynamic Range View Synthesis from Noisy Raw Imagescited by 336
  6. 2020State of the Art on Neural Renderingcited by 278
  7. 2016Fully Convolutional Instance-aware Semantic Segmentationcited by 123
  8. 2021A Structured Dictionary Perspective on Implicit Neural Representationscited by 100
  9. 2023NerfAcc: Efficient Sampling Accelerates NeRFscited by 90
  10. 2021Enhancing Adversarial Robustness via Test-time Transformation Ensemblingcited by 27
  11. 2023VisCo Grids: Surface Reconstruction with Viscosity and Coarea Gridscited by 20
  12. 2023Benchmarking Robustness in Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.