mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Effect of Model Compression on Fairness in Facial Expression Recognition

arXiv 2201.01709 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2022cs.CV cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks have proved hugely successful, achieving human-like performance on a variety of tasks. However, they are also computationally expensive, which has motivated the development of model compression techniques which reduce the resource consumption associated with deep learning models. Nevertheless, recent studies have suggested that model compression can have an adverse effect on algorithmic fairness, amplifying existing biases in machine learning models. With this project we aim to extend those studies to the context of facial expression recognition. To do that, we set up a neural network classifier to perform facial expression recognition and implement several model compression techniques on top of it. We then run experiments on two facial expression datasets, namely the Extended Cohn-Kanade Dataset (CK+DB) and the Real-World Affective Faces Database (RAF-DB), to examine the individual and combined effect that compression techniques have on the model size, accuracy and fairness. Our experimental results show that: (i) Compression and quantisation achieve significant reduction in model size with minimal impact on overall accuracy for both CK+DB and RAF-DB; (ii) in terms of model accuracy, the classifier trained and tested on RAF-DB seems more robust to compression compared to the CK+ DB; (iii) for RAF-DB, the different compression strategies do not seem to increase the gap in predictive performance across the sensitive attributes of gender, race and age which is in contrast with the results on the CK+DB, where compression seems to amplify existing biases for gender. We analyse the results and discuss the potential reasons for our findings.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2022.

Builds on

19 of 55 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  3. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  4. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  5. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  6. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  7. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
  8. 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
  9. 2021Pruning and Quantization for Deep Neural Network Acceleration: A Surveycited by 259
  10. 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
  11. 2020Characterising Bias in Compressed Modelscited by 162
  12. 2020Suppressing Uncertainties for Large-Scale Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 157
7 more
  1. 2019Loss Aware Post-training Quantizationcited by 94
  2. 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
  3. 2019On-Device Neural Net Inference with Mobile GPUscited by 32
  4. 2020Exploring Emotion Features and Fusion Strategies for Audio-Video Emotion Recognitioncited by 24
  5. 2020Prune Responsiblycited by 20
  6. 2020Uses and Abuses of the Cross-Entropy Loss: Case Studies in Modern Deep Learningcited by 10
  7. 2018Training Behavior of Sparse Neural Network Topologiescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: