mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PEAR: Primitive Enabled Adaptive Relabeling for Boosting Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2306.06394 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) has the potential to solve complex long horizon tasks using temporal abstraction and increased exploration. However, hierarchical agents are difficult to train due to inherent non-stationarity. We present primitive enabled adaptive relabeling (PEAR), a two-phase approach where we first perform adaptive relabeling on a few expert demonstrations to generate efficient subgoal supervision, and then jointly optimize HRL agents by employing reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL). We perform theoretical analysis to bound the sub-optimality of our approach and derive a joint optimization framework using RL and IL. Since PEAR utilizes only a few expert demonstrations and considers minimal limiting assumptions on the task structure, it can be easily integrated with typical off-policy RL algorithms to produce a practical HRL approach. We perform extensive experiments on challenging environments and show that PEAR is able to outperform various hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines and achieve upto 80% success rates in complex sparse robotic control tasks where other baselines typically fail to show significant progress. We also perform ablations to thoroughly analyse the importance of our various design choices. Finally, we perform real world robotic experiments on complex tasks and demonstrate that PEAR consistently outperforms the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2023.

Builds on

35 of 55 references.

References · 35

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  4. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  5. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  6. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
  7. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
  8. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
  9. 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
  10. 2016The Option-Critic Architecturecited by 433
  11. 2019Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 380
  12. 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 328
23 more
  1. 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
  2. 2020Accelerating Reinforcement Learning with Learned Skill Priorscited by 220
  3. 2020OPAL: Offline Primitive Discovery for Accelerating Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
  4. 2019Goal-conditioned Imitation Learningcited by 159
  5. 2020Parrot: Data-Driven Behavioral Priors for Reinforcement Learningcited by 136
  6. 2021Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Subgoalscited by 129
  7. 2021Augmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Taskscited by 75
  8. 2018Latent Space Policies for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  9. 2019Why Does Hierarchy (Sometimes) Work So Well in Reinforcement Learning?cited by 66
  10. 2021Accelerating Robotic Reinforcement Learning via Parameterized Action Primitivescited by 63
  11. 2018TACO: Learning Task Decomposition via Temporal Alignment for Controlcited by 61
  12. 2017When Waiting is not an Option : Learning Options with a Deliberation Costcited by 57
  13. 2020Generating Adjacency-Constrained Subgoals in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
  14. 2017Multi-Level Discovery of Deep Optionscited by 50
  15. 2017DDCO: Discovery of Deep Continuous Options for Robot Learning from Demonstrationscited by 43
  16. 2020Data-efficient Hindsight Off-policy Option Learningcited by 31
  17. 2017Deep Q-learning from Demonstrationscited by 27
  18. 2017Learnings Options End-to-End for Continuous Action Taskscited by 24
  19. 2019The Termination Criticcited by 24
  20. 2017Learning Multi-Level Hierarchies with Hindsightcited by 19
  21. 2019Compositional Transfer in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  22. 2019Inter-Level Cooperation in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  23. 2017Learning with Options that Terminate Off-Policycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling
  2. 2018Hierarchical Imitation and Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022STIR2: Reward Relabelling for combined Reinforcement and Imitation Learning on sparse-reward tasks
  4. 2024DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2024MENTOR: Guiding Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback and Dynamic Distance Constraint
  6. 2022Option-Aware Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Control
  7. 2019On-Policy Robot Imitation Learning from a Converging Supervisor
  8. 2025ReWiND: Language-Guided Rewards Teach Robot Policies without New Demonstrations