DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning control policies to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data presents significant challenges. On the one hand, the complexity of such tasks typically requires learning policies to perform a variety of subtasks, then combining them to achieve the overall goal. At the same time, comprehensive, well-engineered reward functions are typically unavailable in such problems, while limited human preference data often is; making efficient use of such data to guide learning is therefore essential. Methods for learning to perform complex robotics tasks from human preference data must overcome both these challenges simultaneously. In this work, we introduce DIPPER: Direct Preference Optimization to Accelerate Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning, an efficient hierarchical approach that leverages direct preference optimization to learn a higher-level policy and reinforcement learning to learn a lower-level policy. DIPPER enjoys improved computational efficiency due to its use of direct preference optimization instead of standard preference-based approaches such as reinforcement learning from human feedback, while it also mitigates the well-known hierarchical reinforcement learning issues of non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation due to our use of primitive-informed regularization inspired by a novel bi-level optimization formulation of the hierarchical reinforcement learning problem. To validate our approach, we perform extensive experimental analysis on a variety of challenging robotics tasks, demonstrating that DIPPER outperforms hierarchical and non-hierarchical baselines, while ameliorating the non-stationarity and infeasible subgoal generation issues of hierarchical reinforcement learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2024PIPER: Primitive-Informed Preference-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Hindsight Relabeling20 Apr
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
- 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
- 2020Weak Human Preference Supervision For Deep Reinforcement Learning25 Jul
- 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari15 Nov
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 20
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 847
- 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 730
- 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
- 2018Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Reviewcited by 466
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
- 2019Relay Policy Learning: Solving Long-Horizon Tasks via Imitation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 380
- 2017FeUdal Networks for Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 328
- 2017Overcoming Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Demonstrationscited by 322
- 2024From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Functioncited by 242
8 more
- 2018Discriminator-Actor-Critic: Addressing Sample Inefficiency and Reward Bias in Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 203
- 2021Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Subgoalscited by 129
- 2022BOME! Bilevel Optimization Made Easy: A Simple First-Order Approachcited by 103
- 2021Augmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Taskscited by 75
- 2019Why Does Hierarchy (Sometimes) Work So Well in Reinforcement Learning?cited by 66
- 2021Accelerating Robotic Reinforcement Learning via Parameterized Action Primitivescited by 63
- 2017When Waiting is not an Option : Learning Options with a Deliberation Costcited by 57
- 2017Learnings Options End-to-End for Continuous Action Taskscited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization for Primitive-Enabled Hierarchical RL: A Bilevel Approach
- 2025Residual Reward Models: Leveraging Prior Knowledge for Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- 2025LAPP: Large Language Model Feedback for Preference-Driven Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Optimizing Neurorobot Policy under Limited Demonstration Data through Preference Regret
- 2025FDPP: Fine-tune Diffusion Policy with Human Preference
- 2026Freeform Preference Learning for Robotic Manipulation
- 2024Sample-Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Dynamics Aware Rewards
- 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function