Navigating Explanatory Multiverse Through Counterfactual Path Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations are the de facto standard when tasked with interpreting decisions of (opaque) predictive models. Their generation is often subject to technical and domain-specific constraints that aim to maximise their real-life utility. In addition to considering desiderata pertaining to the counterfactual instance itself, guaranteeing existence of a viable path connecting it with the factual data point has recently gained relevance. While current explainability approaches ensure that the steps of such a journey as well as its destination adhere to selected constraints, they neglect the multiplicity of these counterfactual paths. To address this shortcoming we introduce the novel concept of explanatory multiverse that encompasses all the possible counterfactual journeys. We define it using vector spaces, showing how to navigate, reason about and compare the geometry of counterfactual trajectories found within it. To this end, we overview their spatial properties -- such as affinity, branching, divergence and possible future convergence -- and propose an all-in-one metric, called opportunity potential, to quantify them. Notably, the explanatory process offered by our method grants explainees more agency by allowing them to select counterfactuals not only based on their absolute differences but also according to the properties of their connecting paths. To demonstrate real-life flexibility, benefit and efficacy of explanatory multiverse we propose its graph-based implementation, which we use for qualitative and quantitative evaluation on six tabular and image data sets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.
Builds on
28 of 62 references.
References · 28
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
- 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
- 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
- 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
16 more
- 2019Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanationscited by 111
- 2019Explainability Fact Sheets: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable Approachescited by 101
- 2021If Only We Had Better Counterfactual Explanations: Five Key Deficits to Rectify in the Evaluation of Counterfactual XAI Techniquescited by 82
- 2020Good Counterfactuals and Where to Find Them: A Case-Based Technique for Generating Counterfactuals for Explainable AI (XAI)cited by 79
- 2017Interpretable Predictions of Tree-based Ensembles via Actionable Feature Tweakingcited by 76
- 2023Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision supportcited by 65
- 2020One Explanation Does Not Fit All: The Promise of Interactive Explanations for Machine Learning Transparencycited by 64
- 2022Probabilistically Robust Recourse: Navigating the Trade-offs between Costs and Robustness in Algorithmic Recoursecited by 40
- 2021Principles of Explanation in Human-AI Systemscited by 25
- 2021Amortized Generation of Sequential Algorithmic Recourses for Black-box Modelscited by 24
- 2019Synthesizing Action Sequences for Modifying Model Decisionscited by 22
- 2023Impact Of Explainable AI On Cognitive Load: Insights From An Empirical Studycited by 15
- 2023Achieving Diversity in Counterfactual Explanations: a Review and Discussioncited by 11
- 2020LIMEtree: Consistent and Faithful Surrogate Explanations of Multiple Classescited by 8
- 2023Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communicationcited by 7
- 2023Helpful, Misleading or Confusing: How Humans Perceive Fundamental Building Blocks of Artificial Intelligence Explanationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Artificial Intelligence Should Genuinely Support Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making To Bridge the Translational Gapcited by 13
- 2023Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recoursecited by 3
- 2023TraCE: Trajectory Counterfactual Explanation Scorescited by 2
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification as a Principled Foundation for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of Counterfactual Explanationscited by 2
- 2024Counterfactual Explanations for Clustering Modelscited by 1
- 2025Artificial Intelligence Should Genuinely Support Clinical Reasoning and Decision Making To Bridge the Translational Gap5 Jun 2025
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification as a Principled Foundation for Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of Counterfactual Explanations24 Feb 2025
- 2024Counterfactual Explanations for Clustering Models19 Sep 2024
- 2023TraCE: Trajectory Counterfactual Explanation Scores27 Sep 2023
- 2023Counterfactual Explanations via Locally-guided Sequential Algorithmic Recourse8 Sep 2023