mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimization-Based Improvement of Face Image Quality Assessment Techniques

arXiv 2305.14856 ↗First posted 24 May 2023cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contemporary face recognition (FR) models achieve near-ideal recognition performance in constrained settings, yet do not fully translate the performance to unconstrained (realworld) scenarios. To help improve the performance and stability of FR systems in such unconstrained settings, face image quality assessment (FIQA) techniques try to infer sample-quality information from the input face images that can aid with the recognition process. While existing FIQA techniques are able to efficiently capture the differences between high and low quality images, they typically cannot fully distinguish between images of similar quality, leading to lower performance in many scenarios. To address this issue, we present in this paper a supervised quality-label optimization approach, aimed at improving the performance of existing FIQA techniques. The developed optimization procedure infuses additional information (computed with a selected FR model) into the initial quality scores generated with a given FIQA technique to produce better estimates of the "actual" image quality. We evaluate the proposed approach in comprehensive experiments with six state-of-the-art FIQA approaches (CR-FIQA, FaceQAN, SER-FIQ, PCNet, MagFace, SDD-FIQA) on five commonly used benchmarks (LFW, CFPFP, CPLFW, CALFW, XQLFW) using three targeted FR models (ArcFace, ElasticFace, CurricularFace) with highly encouraging results.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

Builds on

20 of 31 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
  2. 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
  3. 2020CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 321
  4. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
  5. 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
  6. 2017Cross-Age LFW: A Database for Studying Cross-Age Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 260
  7. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 173
  8. 2021ElasticFace: Elastic Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 144
  9. 2020SER-FIQ: Unsupervised Estimation of Face Image Quality Based on Stochastic Embedding Robustnesscited by 112
  10. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  11. 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
  12. 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 69
8 more
  1. 2021SDD-FIQA: Unsupervised Face Image Quality Assessment with Similarity Distribution Distancecited by 64
  2. 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 62
  3. 2019Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias?cited by 56
  4. 2018On Low-Resolution Face Recognition in the Wild: Comparisons and New Techniquescited by 34
  5. 2021Cross-Quality LFW: A Database for Analyzing Cross-Resolution Image Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 34
  6. 2022FaceQAN: Face Image Quality Assessment Through Adversarial Noise Explorationcited by 18
  7. 2019Learning to Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 14
  8. 2020Inducing Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Face Recognitioncited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.