Inducing Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Face Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowing when an output can be trusted is critical for reliably using face recognition systems. While there has been enormous effort in recent research on improving face verification performance, understanding when a model's predictions should or should not be trusted has received far less attention. Our goal is to assign a confidence score for a face image that reflects its quality in terms of recognizable information. To this end, we propose a method for generating image quality training data automatically from 'mated-pairs' of face images, and use the generated data to train a lightweight Predictive Confidence Network, termed as PCNet, for estimating the confidence score of a face image. We systematically evaluate the usefulness of PCNet with its error versus reject performance, and demonstrate that it can be universally paired with and improve the robustness of any verification model. We describe three use cases on the public IJB-C face verification benchmark: (i) to improve 1:1 image-based verification error rates by rejecting low-quality face images; (ii) to improve quality score based fusion performance on the 1:1 set-based verification benchmark; and (iii) its use as a quality measure for selecting high quality (unblurred, good lighting, more frontal) faces from a collection, e.g. for automatic enrolment or display.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 68
- 2023DifFIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment Using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 22
- 2022FaceQAN: Face Image Quality Assessment Through Adversarial Noise Explorationcited by 17
- 2023Recognizability Embedding Enhancement for Very Low-Resolution Face Recognition and Quality Estimationcited by 16
- 2022Stating Comparison Score Uncertainty and Verification Decision Confidence Towards Transparent Face Recognitioncited by 9
- 2022Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessmentcited by 5
- 2023Optimization-Based Improvement of Face Image Quality Assessment Techniquescited by 4
- 2025FROQ: Observing Face Recognition Models for Efficient Quality Assessmentcited by 4
- 2024AI-KD: Towards Alignment Invariant Face Image Quality Assessment Using Knowledge Distillationcited by 1
- 2024Impact of Face Alignment on Face Image Qualitycited by 1
- 2022Iterative Optimization of Pseudo Ground-Truth Face Image Quality Labelscited by 0
- 2026PreFIQs: Face Image Quality Is What Survives Pruningcited by 0
- 2026PreFIQs: Face Image Quality Is What Survives Pruning13 May 2026
- 2025FROQ: Observing Face Recognition Models for Efficient Quality Assessment22 Sep 2025
- 2024Impact of Face Alignment on Face Image Quality16 Dec 2024
- 2024AI-KD: Towards Alignment Invariant Face Image Quality Assessment Using Knowledge Distillation15 Apr 2024
- 2023Optimization-Based Improvement of Face Image Quality Assessment Techniques24 May 2023
- 2023DifFIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment Using Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models9 May 2023
- 2023Recognizability Embedding Enhancement for Very Low-Resolution Face Recognition and Quality Estimation20 Apr 2023
- 2022FaceQAN: Face Image Quality Assessment Through Adversarial Noise Exploration5 Dec 2022
- 2022Assessing Bias in Face Image Quality Assessment28 Nov 2022
- 2022Stating Comparison Score Uncertainty and Verification Decision Confidence Towards Transparent Face Recognition19 Oct 2022
- 2022Iterative Optimization of Pseudo Ground-Truth Face Image Quality Labels31 Aug 2022
- 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiability13 Dec 2021