mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analyzing Hong Kong's Legal Judgments from a Computational Linguistics point-of-view

arXiv 2305.02558 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.CL cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Analysis and extraction of useful information from legal judgments using computational linguistics was one of the earliest problems posed in the domain of information retrieval. Presently, several commercial vendors exist who automate such tasks. However, a crucial bottleneck arises in the form of exorbitant pricing and lack of resources available in analysis of judgements mete out by Hong Kong's Legal System. This paper attempts to bridge this gap by providing several statistical, machine learning, deep learning and zero-shot learning based methods to effectively analyze legal judgments from Hong Kong's Court System. The methods proposed consists of: (1) Citation Network Graph Generation, (2) PageRank Algorithm, (3) Keyword Analysis and Summarization, (4) Sentiment Polarity, and (5) Paragrah Classification, in order to be able to extract key insights from individual as well a group of judgments together. This would make the overall analysis of judgments in Hong Kong less tedious and more automated in order to extract insights quickly using fast inferencing. We also provide an analysis of our results by benchmarking our results using Large Language Models making robust use of the HuggingFace ecosystem.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2021Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detectioncited by 264
  4. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 209
  5. 2018CAIL2018: A Large-Scale Legal Dataset for Judgment Predictioncited by 170
  6. 2019Large-Scale Multi-Label Text Classification on EU Legislationcited by 104
  7. 2017Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basiscited by 61
  8. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 53
  9. 2018Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptionscited by 36
  10. 2019Plain English Summarization of Contractscited by 28
  11. 2019CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehensioncited by 26
  12. 2020Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Modelcited by 24
2 more
  1. 2018Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehensioncited by 19
  2. 2020Keyword Assisted Topic Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.