mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representation

arXiv 2304.11501 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Translated texts bear several hallmarks distinct from texts originating in the language. Though individual translated texts are often fluent and preserve meaning, at a large scale, translated texts have statistical tendencies which distinguish them from text originally written in the language ("translationese") and can affect model performance. We frame the novel task of translationese reduction and hypothesize that Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR), a graph-based semantic representation which abstracts away from the surface form, can be used as an interlingua to reduce the amount of translationese in translated texts. By parsing English translations into an AMR and then generating text from that AMR, the result more closely resembles originally English text across three quantitative macro-level measures, without severely compromising fluency or adequacy. We compare our AMR-based approach against three other techniques based on machine translation or paraphrase generation. This work makes strides towards reducing translationese in text and highlights the utility of AMR as an interlingua.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2023.

Builds on

19 of 62 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  4. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  5. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
  6. 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
  7. 2019The Effect of Translationese in Machine Translation Test Setscited by 49
  8. 2016Personalized Machine Translation: Preserving Original Author Traitscited by 47
  9. 2019Controllable Paraphrase Generation with a Syntactic Exemplarcited by 44
  10. 2019Semantic Neural Machine Translation using AMRcited by 37
  11. 2019Post-editese: an Exacerbated Translationesecited by 29
  12. 2020Can Automatic Post-Editing Improve NMT?cited by 17
7 more
  1. 2022Understanding Translationese in Cross-Lingual Summarizationcited by 14
  2. 2021Comparing Feature-Engineering and Feature-Learning Approaches for Multilingual Translationese Classificationcited by 13
  3. 2019Translating Translationese: A Two-Step Approach to Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 11
  4. 2022Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performancecited by 11
  5. 2022Controlling Styles in Neural Machine Translation with Activation Promptcited by 7
  6. 2022T-STAR: Truthful Style Transfer using AMR Graph as Intermediate Representationcited by 6
  7. 2016On the Similarities Between Native, Non-native and Translated Textscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

10 papers.