mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Controlling Styles in Neural Machine Translation with Activation Prompt

arXiv 2212.08909 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2022cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Controlling styles in neural machine translation (NMT) has attracted wide attention, as it is crucial for enhancing user experience. Earlier studies on this topic typically concentrate on regulating the level of formality and achieve some progress in this area. However, they still encounter two major challenges. The first is the difficulty in style evaluation. The style comprises various aspects such as lexis, syntax, and others that provide abundant information. Nevertheless, only formality has been thoroughly investigated. The second challenge involves excessive dependence on incremental adjustments, particularly when new styles are necessary. To address both challenges, this paper presents a new benchmark and approach. A multiway stylized machine translation (MSMT) benchmark is introduced, incorporating diverse categories of styles across four linguistic domains. Then, we propose a method named style activation prompt (StyleAP) by retrieving prompts from stylized monolingual corpus, which does not require extra fine-tuning. Experiments show that StyleAP could effectively control the style of translation and achieve remarkable performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2022.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,935
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  6. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  7. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  8. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  9. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  10. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  11. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
  12. 2017Neural Style Transfer: A Reviewcited by 199
12 more
  1. 2017Style Transfer in Text: Exploration and Evaluationcited by 146
  2. 2021Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Translation Memorycited by 61
  3. 2022Training Data is More Valuable than You Think: A Simple and Effective Method by Retrieving from Training Datacited by 61
  4. 2016Personalized Machine Translation: Preserving Original Author Traitscited by 47
  5. 2020Rethinking Document-level Neural Machine Translationcited by 32
  6. 2018Extreme Adaptation for Personalized Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  7. 2019Adapting Language Models for Non-Parallel Author-Stylized Rewritingcited by 23
  8. 2020NeurST: Neural Speech Translation Toolkitcited by 23
  9. 2019Controlling Neural Machine Translation Formality with Synthetic Supervisioncited by 18
  10. 2019Generating Diverse Translation by Manipulating Multi-Head Attentioncited by 14
  11. 2020Generating Diverse Translation from Model Distribution with Dropoutcited by 10
  12. 2022Zero-shot Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation with Retrieved Phrase-level Promptscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

7 papers.