Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Human-translated text displays distinct features from naturally written text in the same language. This phenomena, known as translationese, has been argued to confound the machine translation (MT) evaluation. Yet, we find that existing work on translationese neglects some important factors and the conclusions are mostly correlational but not causal. In this work, we collect CausalMT, a dataset where the MT training data are also labeled with the human translation directions. We inspect two critical factors, the train-test direction match (whether the human translation directions in the training and test sets are aligned), and data-model direction match (whether the model learns in the same direction as the human translation direction in the dataset). We show that these two factors have a large causal effect on the MT performance, in addition to the test-model direction mismatch highlighted by existing work on the impact of translationese. In light of our findings, we provide a set of suggestions for MT training and evaluation. Our code and data are at https://github.com/EdisonNi-hku/CausalMT
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.
Builds on
23 of 81 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 723
- 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 593
- 2019Facebook FAIR's WMT19 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 179
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 155
- 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 110
- 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
- 2018Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translationcited by 58
11 more
- 2019The Effect of Translationese in Machine Translation Test Setscited by 49
- 2019On The Evaluation of Machine Translation Systems Trained With Back-Translationcited by 40
- 2019Translationese in Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 38
- 2019Translationese as a Language in "Multilingual" NMTcited by 36
- 2019IMaT: Unsupervised Text Attribute Transfer via Iterative Matching and Translationcited by 33
- 2019Domain, Translationese and Noise in Synthetic Data for Neural Machine Translationcited by 26
- 2019Using Monolingual Data in Neural Machine Translation: a Systematic Studycited by 21
- 2021Causal Direction of Data Collection Matters: Implications of Causal and Anticausal Learning for NLPcited by 21
- 2018Investigating Backtranslation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 14
- 2016Unsupervised Identification of Translationesecited by 9
- 2014Exploratory Analysis of a Terabyte Scale Web Corpuscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Modelscited by 68
- 2023Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languagescited by 33
- 2025Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMscited by 11
- 2023Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 10
- 2023Has It All Been Solved? Open NLP Research Questions Not Solved by Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2024Pretraining Language Models Using Translationesecited by 6
- 2023Measuring Spurious Correlation in Classification: 'Clever Hans' in Translationesecited by 5
- 2024Machine Translation Models are Zero-Shot Detectors of Translation Directioncited by 3
- 2024Translation Deserves Better: Analyzing Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Visual Question Answeringcited by 2
- 2024Mitigating Translationese in Low-resource Languages: The Storyboard Approachcited by 2
- 2024CRAT: A Multi-Agent Framework for Causality-Enhanced Reflective and Retrieval-Augmented Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs6 Mar 2025
- 2024CRAT: A Multi-Agent Framework for Causality-Enhanced Reflective and Retrieval-Augmented Translation with Large Language Models28 Oct 2024
- 2024Mitigating Translationese in Low-resource Languages: The Storyboard Approach14 Jul 2024
- 2024Translation Deserves Better: Analyzing Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Visual Question Answering4 Jun 2024
- 2024Pretraining Language Models Using Translationese20 Mar 2024
- 2024Machine Translation Models are Zero-Shot Detectors of Translation Direction12 Jan 2024
- 2023Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages23 Oct 2023
- 2023Measuring Spurious Correlation in Classification: 'Clever Hans' in Translationese25 Aug 2023
- 2023Has It All Been Solved? Open NLP Research Questions Not Solved by Large Language Models21 May 2023
- 2023Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representation23 Apr 2023
- 2022A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models21 Oct 2022