mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-perspective Alignment for Increasing Naturalness in Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2412.08473 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2024cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural machine translation (NMT) systems amplify lexical biases present in their training data, leading to artificially impoverished language in output translations. These language-level characteristics render automatic translations different from text originally written in a language and human translations, which hinders their usefulness in for example creating evaluation datasets. Attempts to increase naturalness in NMT can fall short in terms of content preservation, where increased lexical diversity comes at the cost of translation accuracy. Inspired by the reinforcement learning from human feedback framework, we introduce a novel method that rewards both naturalness and content preservation. We experiment with multiple perspectives to produce more natural translations, aiming at reducing machine and human translationese. We evaluate our method on English-to-Dutch literary translation, and find that our best model produces translations that are lexically richer and exhibit more properties of human-written language, without loss in translation accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.

Builds on

25 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Model23 Jan
  2. 2023Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference15 Nov

Other references · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  6. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  8. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 205
  9. 2019BERTje: A Dutch BERT Modelcited by 109
  10. 2020Translation Artifacts in Cross-lingual Transfer Learningcited by 95
  11. 2024MetricX-24: The Google Submission to the WMT 2024 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 92
  12. 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
11 more
  1. 2019The Effect of Translationese in Machine Translation Test Setscited by 49
  2. 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
  3. 2019Post-editese: an Exacerbated Translationesecited by 29
  4. 2021Thank you BART! Rewarding Pre-Trained Models Improves Formality Style Transfercited by 28
  5. 2021Comparing Feature-Engineering and Feature-Learning Approaches for Multilingual Translationese Classificationcited by 13
  6. 2021The Impact of Post-editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experiencecited by 10
  7. 2021Generic resources are what you need: Style transfer tasks without task-specific parallel training datacited by 10
  8. 2023Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 10
  9. 2023Translating away Translationese without Parallel Datacited by 5
  10. 2024Towards Tailored Recovery of Lexical Diversity in Literary Machine Translationcited by 5
  11. 2023Automatic Discrimination of Human and Neural Machine Translation in Multilingual Scenarioscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Cross-lingual Human-Preference Alignment for Neural Machine Translation with Direct Quality Optimization
  2. 2024Advancing Translation Preference Modeling with RLHF: A Step Towards Cost-Effective Solution
  3. 2025Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  4. 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysis
  5. 2017Reinforcement Learning for Bandit Neural Machine Translation with Simulated Human Feedback
  6. 2023Data-Efficient Alignment of Large Language Models with Human Feedback Through Natural Language
  7. 2026North Small Translate: Advanced Cost-Effective Translation (Cohere CAT+)
  8. 2026Backtranslation Augmented Direct Preference Optimization for Neural Machine Translation