mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reassessing Graph Linearization for Sequence-to-sequence AMR Parsing: On the Advantages and Limitations of Triple-Based Encoding

arXiv 2505.08504 ↗First posted 13 May 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequence-to-sequence models are widely used to train Abstract Meaning Representation (Banarescu et al., 2013, AMR) parsers. To train such models, AMR graphs have to be linearized into a one-line text format. While Penman encoding is typically used for this purpose, we argue that it has limitations: (1) for deep graphs, some closely related nodes are located far apart in the linearized text (2) Penman's tree-based encoding necessitates inverse roles to handle node re-entrancy, doubling the number of relation types to predict. To address these issues, we propose a triple-based linearization method and compare its efficiency with Penman linearization. Although triples are well suited to represent a graph, our results suggest room for improvement in triple encoding to better compete with Penman's concise and explicit representation of a nested graph structure.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 14 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017Neural AMR: Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Parsing and Generationcited by 56
  2. 2020Contrastive Triple Extraction with Generative Transformercited by 44
  3. 2017Neural Semantic Parsing by Character-based Translation: Experiments with Abstract Meaning Representationscited by 18
  4. 2018Exploring Neural Methods for Parsing Discourse Representation Structurescited by 15
  5. 2018Evaluating Scoped Meaning Representationscited by 11
  6. 2023ParaAMR: A Large-Scale Syntactically Diverse Paraphrase Dataset by AMR Back-Translationcited by 11
  7. 2023Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.