mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Sentence Smith: Controllable Edits for Evaluating Text Embeddings

arXiv 2502.14734 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Controllable and transparent text generation has been a long-standing goal in NLP. Almost as long-standing is a general idea for addressing this challenge: Parsing text to a symbolic representation, and generating from it. However, earlier approaches were hindered by parsing and generation insufficiencies. Using modern parsers and a safety supervision mechanism, we show how close current methods come to this goal. Concretely, we propose the Sentence Smith framework for English, which has three steps: 1. Parsing a sentence into a semantic graph. 2. Applying human-designed semantic manipulation rules. 3. Generating text from the manipulated graph. A final entailment check (4.) verifies the validity of the applied transformation. To demonstrate our framework's utility, we use it to induce hard negative text pairs that challenge text embedding models. Since the controllable generation makes it possible to clearly isolate different types of semantic shifts, we can evaluate text embedding models in a fine-grained way, also addressing an issue in current benchmarking where linguistic phenomena remain opaque. Human validation confirms that our transparent generation process produces texts of good quality. Notably, our way of generation is very resource-efficient, since it relies only on smaller neural networks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

36 of 74 references.

References · 36

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  4. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  5. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  6. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  7. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  8. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
  9. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
  10. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
  11. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  12. 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 299
24 more
  1. 2019PAWS-X: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identificationcited by 262
  2. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 207
  3. 2022SGPT: GPT Sentence Embeddings for Semantic Searchcited by 204
  4. 2020Syntactic Data Augmentation Increases Robustness to Inference Heuristicscited by 85
  5. 2023NPHardEval: Dynamic Benchmark on Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models via Complexity Classescited by 78
  6. 2023Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyondcited by 65
  7. 2023Jina Embeddings: A Novel Set of High-Performance Sentence Embedding Modelscited by 35
  8. 2022SBERT studies Meaning Representations: Decomposing Sentence Embeddings into Explainable Semantic Featurescited by 33
  9. 2020Linguistically-Informed Transformations (LIT): A Method for Automatically Generating Contrast Setscited by 31
  10. 2024A Closer Look at Classification Evaluation Metrics and a Critical Reflection of Common Evaluation Practicecited by 26
  11. 2021Translate, then Parse! A strong baseline for Cross-Lingual AMR Parsingcited by 15
  12. 2020A Human Evaluation of AMR-to-English Generation Systemscited by 13
  13. 2023With a Little Push, NLI Models can Robustly and Efficiently Predict Faithfulnesscited by 13
  14. 2023Lost in Translationese? Reducing Translation Effect Using Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 10
  15. 2022Better Smatch = Better Parser? AMR evaluation is not so simple anymorecited by 9
  16. 2024ABEX: Data Augmentation for Low-Resource NLU via Expanding Abstract Descriptionscited by 8
  17. 2023Incorporating Graph Information in Transformer-based AMR Parsingcited by 7
  18. 2024PARAPHRASUS : A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Paraphrase Detection Modelscited by 7
  19. 2022T-STAR: Truthful Style Transfer using AMR Graph as Intermediate Representationcited by 6
  20. 2024Tracking linguistic information in transformer-based sentence embeddings through targeted sparsificationcited by 6
  21. 2024Exploring syntactic information in sentence embeddings through multilingual subject-verb agreementcited by 6
  22. 2024Exploring Italian sentence embeddings properties through multi-taskingcited by 6
  23. 2025Examining Multilingual Embedding Models Cross-Lingually Through LLM-Generated Adversarial Examplescited by 3
  24. 2024Should Cross-Lingual AMR Parsing go Meta? An Empirical Assessment of Meta-Learning and Joint Learning AMR Parsingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.